Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Sermon Video: "TO AN UNKNOWN GOD" - Acts 17:16-34



After having been chased out of Thessalonica by yet another angry mob of Jewish men who rejected his message in the synagogue, Paul moved to Berea only to have their inquisitiveness about the message undermined by troublemakers who followed him from Thessalonica.  Paul is once more forced to flee, and then finds himself alone in Athens waiting for the rest of his missions team to arrive.  What will he do under these unexpected and undesired circumstances?  Paul goes to the synagogue in Athens, as is his habit, but also decides to take his message to the streets of the market where he is noticed by Epicurean and Stoic philosophers and brought to the Areopagus to explain his novel idea to the learned men there.
            How should Paul begin to explain the Gospel’s message of sin, judgment, and forgiveness that centers around the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ to these men who care nothing of the Hebrew scriptures and who already consider themselves to be sufficiently religious?  Rather than denigrating the rampant idolatry that Athens is full of, Paul studies the beliefs of his audience in order to find common ground through which he can share the Gospel with them.  The common ground that Paul finds is a shared desire to seek and find God as expressed by the idol he found with the inscription, “TO AN UNKNOWN GOD”.
            By meeting his audience where they currently are, Paul is able to explain the Gospel’s message of God’s desire to be found by humanity using language that his audience would understand, even quoting their own philosophers to punctuate his point.  Paul thus demonstrates a willingness to present the Gospel in any way that will reach his intended audience, an attitude that requires both humility on the part of the speaker and compassion for the lost.
            Paul was willing to begin his message in an unorthodox manner to allow his audience to understand it, but he still knew that he had to end it with the truth of the resurrection.  This particular point was sure to cause his audience to think less of his message, but Paul knew that it was absolutely necessary.  In our day, we also need to be willing to adapt the presentation of the Gospel to allow those who would not understand it otherwise to hear God’s Word to them, but we too need to cling to the core message of the Gospel even if it is as unpopular for us as it was for Paul in Athens.  In the end, only a handful of Athenians believed Paul’s message and he wasn’t able to establish a church there, but he planted the seeds just the same.  God will make the seed grow, and even if only one or two plants sprout from our efforts, we know that angels will be rejoicing when those lost sinners come home.

To watch the video, click on the link below:

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Sermon Video: How do we react to trouble? - Acts 16:16-40



How Christians react to trouble matters a great deal.  It matters because we all will endure hardship at some point, whether through our own poor choices, the malice of others, or accidents for which no one is to blame.  Trouble will come to people of faith as it comes to everyone else.  Being a believer in Jesus Christ does not exempt any of us from physical, financial, or emotional turmoil; anybody who preaches otherwise is ignoring the clear teaching of Scripture on this subject.  How we respond to it also matters because the Lost are watching.  Those who don’t have a relationship with God through Jesus are watching to see if what we have is as valuable as we claim.  If our reaction to trouble is no better than their reaction would be, would difference is our faith making?  This isn’t about holding grief or sorrow in and pretending they don’t exist, that’s not the solution at all, but rather about having perspective and persevering through the difficult times because of the hope that we have in God.
            On the second missionary journey, Paul and Silas faced trouble in the form of any angry mob whose racists charge against them as troublemakers resulted in a severe (and illegal for they were both Roman citizens) flogging and jail term.  The pain and humiliation of that beating was very real, as was the clear injustice of the violation of their rights.  How did Paul and Silas respond?  With prayer and singing that very night in the jail cell.  I can understand the prayer; we all lean on prayer more when times are tough, but the singing?  How can you sing when your back is a bloody mess, at the hands of those who hate people like you, while you were trying to do the work of God?  Such a response can only be an act of grace, from God, to his people through the power of the Holy Spirit.
            As Paul and Silas prayed and sang, the rest of the prisoners were listening.  When an earthquake opened the doors of the prison, they didn’t run; they had heard something worth sticking around for.  When the jailer saw the doors he was going to kill himself out of shame, but the reaction of Paul and Silas to suffering had kept the inmates at the jail and thus saved the jailer’s life.  When he fell trembling before them his question was clear, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?”  Why did he ask such a question?  Because Paul and Silas had demonstrated by their reaction to trouble that they knew the answer.  That very evening this man and his whole family became believers and were baptized.  How we respond to trouble matters.

To watch the video, click on the link below:

Friday, April 25, 2014

The future and the hope of the Church is found in the poor



In reading through A Testament to Freedom: The Essential Writings of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, I came across an insight about the Church from his doctoral dissertation The Communion of Saints.  When looking out at the Church in his native Germany, Bonhoeffer encountered a comfortable middle class church that while still offering social programs for the poor, had failed to include them in its community.  He wrote,
"for the church of today everything depends on its once more approaching the masses which have turned away from it, and, moreover; in such a way that the church brings the gospel into real contact with the present situation of the poor working classes, in full attentiveness to how these masses look upon the gospel."
There are some churches, particularly in blighted urban areas, who have successfully brought the Gospel to the working poor and made them part of the Church of Jesus Christ.  Unfortunately, for too many of our churches, this is not the case.  The Church has lost the rich, but it rarely has ever had them anyway, and it has lost the poor.  The majority of my church, and all of our churches, is middle class people.  Here in our county the working poor and the non-working poor are a large percentage of the population, but a very small percentage of our churches.  How did this happen, how can it be solved?
            Bonhoeffer continued with his line of thought by adding, “the future and the hope for our ‘bourgeois’ church lies in a renewal of its lifeblood, which is only possible if the church succeeds in winning over the poor working classes.”  Don’t let the fancy French word “bourgeois” mess you up, just substitute “middle-class” in its place and you’ll be fine.  Finding a way to make the Church appeal to the rich will never be the answer.  The Church in Franklin, in Venango County, in Pennsylvania, and in America will begin to find revival when it finds a way to reach the poor amongst us with the Gospel and truly make them a part of our community.  Hope that we can accomplish this should not be hard to find, for “there is no modern power that is basically more open to the Christian gospel than these poor workers.  These avid, poor workers know only one affliction, isolation, and they cry out for one thing, community.”  I have certainly seen this with my own eyes.  In our work with Mustard Seed Missions we have been able to help hundreds of families with serious physical needs, but the greatest need for nearly all of them is to be part of a community; that is why our organization always makes its last step in helping someone the sending of a church near to them to do follow-up and offer them the chance to be a part of a community.  The idea of belonging to a neighborhood no longer exists as it once did in America.  People move too often, we drive too far to go to work and to church for any neighborhood to exist on its own.
            How do we know if our churches have become isolated from the poor in our midst?
“The best proof is that the poor working classes have turned away from the church, whereas the bourgeois have remained.  So the sermon is aimed at relatively secure people, living adequately in orderly family circumstances, relatively ‘educated’ and relatively solid in their morality.”
Here Bonhoeffer’s wisdom hits us squarely in the chest.  Why do people in our churches deplore the morality of “them” and choose to fight in a social war rather than take the gospel to the poor?  Because we’re comfortable here; because the Church has managed to create a little sanctuary within our community where things are a little better than out there, but only at the expense and with the consequence of making those on the outside no longer feel welcome amongst us.  In such a situation, “The danger of the church’s becoming a mere association is obvious.”  What prevents a group of relatively well off Christians from acting like a social club instead of being on fire for God’s work in our world?  It will only be our connection to, and acceptance of, the poor in our midst.  Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s observations about the churches of Germany in 1930 are entirely relevant for the Church in America today.  When we find a way to make the poor feel like this is their church too, when their problems become our problems, God will truly be alive and well in our midst.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Sermon Video: "But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead." - I Corinthians 15:12-22



There has been much discussion in recent generations about the possibility of removing the teachings and ethics of Jesus from the life and divine claims in order to preserve a version of Jesus that feels acceptable to those who discount the possibility of miracles.  When Paul wrote to the church in Corinth, he reminded them of the original message of the Gospel that he had taught, and they had believed, which contained a clear understanding that Jesus Christ had risen from the dead three days after his crucifixion.  The people of Corinth had evidently believed Paul’s word initially but had later succumbed to or been tempted by doubts arising from cultural problems with the idea of a bodily resurrection.  In the end, the modern skeptic and the ancient Greeks of Corinth have the same problem; they doubt that the resurrection of Jesus could have taken place.  What is the response of the Word of God to both groups?  Without the resurrection there is no hope.
            The entirety of the Church and the Christian faith are built upon the historic fact of the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.  Without this foundational truth, the whole structure built upon it, from ethics and charity to prayer and worship, will come crumbling down.  Paul was not willing to accept a “diet” version of Christianity in his day any more than the Church should be willing to listen to calls to leave out the miracles in ours.  Without the resurrection, our faith is meaningless, our purpose is lost, and our sins remain.
            The problem faced by those who refuse to believe in the resurrection is that they have then no answer for the problem of evil in our world.  Without the resurrection as a means to obtain forgiveness, healing, and reconciliation from God, we have no hope of a better tomorrow and certainly no hope in any life beyond this one. 
            “But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead”.  Hope is available because Jesus did conquer sin and death, forgiveness is available because Jesus’ payment for your sins was accepted by the Father and his sacrifice was vindicated by the power of his return from the dead to new life.  From this central truth, all of Christianity flows, and from it we offer God’s love to the world.

To watch the video, click on the link below:

Friday, April 18, 2014

Sermon Video: Taking the bread and cup in a worthy manner - I Corinthians 11:27-32



The Church in Corinth had a unity problem.  In Paul’s first letter to this church, he writes disapprovingly about their approach to the communal meal that included their celebration of Communion.  As part of that discussion Paul warns against anyone who “eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner.” (I Corinthians 11:27)  What does it mean to take Communion in an “unworthy” manner?  Paul goes on to describe the judgment that will come from God against those who do this, so figuring out what he means is important to us.
            For the Church in Corinth the primary issue was unity, that lesson will apply to some churches and some Christians who struggle with the issue of placing the bond of Christ above all other distinctions.  But for others, the issue of not being “unworthy” reflects the larger principle of maintaining a proper relationship with God.  We know that anyone who approaches Communion in an irreverent or flippant way would be mocking the table of the Lord, but what of those whose fault is that they approach Communion while still walking in darkness?  Because God desires a relationship with his people, a relationship defined by his character and Law, it is unacceptable for the people of God to try to serve two masters by keeping one foot in the world of sin and one foot in the kingdom of God.  Such hypocrisy is self-destructive; it will lead to our own physical, emotional, mental, or spiritual demise.  We cannot come to the Communion table with an unrepentant heart beholden to wickedness.
            What is Paul’s solution to the danger of being “unworthy”?  Judge yourself.  Take the time to examine your own heart and mind to see if there is anything there that is causing, or could cause, damage to your relationship with your heavenly Father.  We know that it is necessary to be proactive in our marriages, necessary to put in the time and effort to keep the passion alive.  Our spouse doesn’t deserve to be ignored, neglected, and certainly not cheated upon.  Why would our relationship with God deserve any less?
            In a nation where the majority of people self-identify as Christians, there should not  be such high rates of abortion, divorce, infidelity, gambling, drug addiction, fraud, and whatever other vice you want to consider.  These problems are not simply problem outside our churches; these sins infect the body of Christ.  When the Church of Jesus Christ stars choosing righteousness over wickedness, when the Church takes its marriage vow as the bride of Christ seriously, our society will change.  It is no wonder when the Lost act according to their sin nature, but the people of God are supposed to be different.  We have been washed clean by the precious blood of the Lamb; we cannot walk in darkness and have fellowship with our Savior. 
            Why do we take Communion, why do we go to Church, why do we volunteer to serve?  All these and more are ways in which we can fill up our lives with righteousness and holiness.  The key to avoiding sin is not simply avoiding temptation.  Success against temptation will be found when we leave no room in our lives for sin to take root.  Let us them examine ourselves, confess our sins, and approach the table of the Lord with humility as we do what is necessary to build up our relationship with God and indeed be “worthy” of that union.

To watch the video, click on the link below: