Showing posts with label Thinking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thinking. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 30, 2024

"A singular focus on preparing students for meaningful jobs and careers" would be the death of Christian Higher Education - A response to the essay by Cornerstone University's President Moreno-Riaño on Fox News

 


Here's what American universities should teach instead of activism Industry and moral skills are essential for our students and the future of our country By Gerson Moreno-Riaño Fox News Published July 27, 2024

Honestly, when my alma mater, Cornerstone University sent me an email touting this essay by President Moreno-Riaño and asking me to share it on social media, I don't think they had this in mind.  However, the excellent professors of the Humanities Department, the one that President Moreno-Riaño demolished this year {The Cornerstone University I graduated from is no more, my daughter won't be going there.} me how to think, so that's what I'll do.

{The Fox News essay is below in italics, my commentary will be in brackets [and bold]}


Colleges and universities are failing our country. This seems to be the growing consensus among an increasingly large percentage of Americans and business leaders.

[From the very start this essay bothers me a great deal.  This is being written by the President of Cornerstone University, I had great respect for this university's past presidents, but I have no respect for the attitude of President Moreno-Riaño which in this essay is being derived from business concerns and survey results.  Why?  Because Cornerstone University is supposed to be a Christian organization.  That's why it was founded, that was its mission for generations, and that is one of the main reasons why most of its students chose to go there, it brought me there in 1994.  A Christian organization, be it a church, a publishing house, a homeless shelter, or a school, is not supposed to be swimming with the current of our culture, business world, and politics, instead we are to serve a different master, on a different mission.  As an essay about secular Higher Education this opening line would still be disturbing as it frames the conversation about higher education as an ordinary business, which it is not, but coming from the President of Cornerstone University, it is ominous indeed.]

The recent Gallup and Lumina Foundation report shows that an increasing number of Americans have little to no confidence in higher education. For the first time since Gallup begin to measure the confidence level in higher education, America is "now nearly equally divided among those who have a great deal or quite a lot of confidence (36%), some confidence (32%), or little or no confidence (32%) in higher education."  

This finding represents a seismic shift from 2015, when almost 60% of Americans had a high level of confidence and 10% had little or none. 

[Opinion surveys reflect what the people who respond to them are ingesting, not necessarily what is real.  It isn't a coincidence that Fox News and similar outlets run stories and opinion pieces attacking higher education (and public education in general) on a regular basis.  Perhaps this steady drumbeat of doom and gloom has something to do with the changing attitudes found in the survey?]

Many business leaders equally reflect the growing lack of confidence. In a recent interview, Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase CEO, criticized colleges and universities for the little focus they place on helping graduates find good employment. 

This unwillingness, so argues Dimon, not only places an exorbitant amount of pressure on businesses to train their employees – something pre-employment education should do – but also disenfranchises large sectors of society.  

Kiersten Barnet, executive director of New York Jobs CEO Council – a group of 30 of America’s top CEOs and their companies – was perhaps more direct than Dimon, stating: "When you think about what you need to do a job, it is skills. It's not a degree."

[I don't know Jamie Dimon or Kiersten Barnet, so this is nothing personal about either or them, but is the goal of higher education to please the CEO of a giant corporation or the executive director of an organization representing our nation's largest business interests?  Again, this may legitimately be one of the goals of secular higher education, to bolster the economy by providing workers suitable to what businesses want, but nowhere in this essay is the question asked, let alone answered, "What kind of students ought Christian Higher Education be aiming to form?  What role does Christian discipleship play in the process of educating young people?  How can our professors be mentors to students, not simply teaching them job skills but how to mature into God-honoring adults?"]

America’s growing doubts about colleges and universities are rooted in a list of causes too long to detail here, but it is worth noting that the lack of confidence is connected to certain factors. The most notable of these being what colleges and universities teach and do not teach. 

In Gallup’s report, of the Americans who register little or no confidence, almost 40%, criticize colleges and universities "for not teaching relevant skills, for college degrees not meaning much, or for graduates not being able to find employment."

Indeed, a new survey released this week by Cengage Group found that 55% of recent graduates said their degree programs did not prepare them for the workforce, with 70% saying basic AI training should be taught. These are, in essence, the same concerns of business leaders like Dimon and Barnet.

[Basic AI training?  God help us.  So much for being taught how to think biblically.] 

Gallup’s report goes a step further, however. Slightly over 40% of Americans in this same low to no confidence group think that our colleges and universities "are pushing certain political agendas." In short, many believe that higher education is miseducating our students. Rather than preparing for careers and a productive life, colleges and universities appear to be preparing students to be radical activists.  

[I don't disagree that today's students could use less politics in their lives, so could the millions of adults who spend way to much time engaged in the bashing of "them" and uncritical praising of "us."  Politics is a drug, much of America is addicted, and it isn't healthy.  But is the answer to focus on job skills and give up on the Humanities??  Such a notion would have horrified our ancestors in the faith, men and women who were deeply educated in languages, art, history, philosophy, music, and more.]

Further, the miseducation of our students as it relates to gainful employment – "good jobs" – is a serious problem since it robs from our students the opportunity for a fuller humanity. Jobs and compensation are essential for our humanity. But good jobs and good compensation are even more essential for a flourishing humanity and, by extension, a flourishing society. 

Amid its many laudable goals, higher education must focus on preparing students for good jobs and compensation. To do any less is to perpetrate a great injustice on our students and our future. 

[A good job is better than a bad job.  Is that all higher education should be about?  If people earn more money will they have better lives, will society be uplifted if our graduates have career success?  The answers to such questions aren't simple, at least they shouldn't be.  The university that I graduated from in the 1990's had a much more holistic approach to the flourishing of its students, both while they attended and preparing them for the future.]

When students are miseducated to become radical activists, the injustice perpetrated is even greater and the damage is even more corrosive. Students are duped into believing that radical activism adds value to their own life and to society when in fact it is the opposite. Such pursuits rob from students the exercise of their productive full potential, thus undermining their good as well as that of all society.

[That is a really bold statement, one worthy of a pundit or politician, but one that should be unworthy of a university president.  You know what adds value to life?  Having a purpose greater than earning money.  You know what uplifts society?  People willing to sacrifice for causes they deem greater than themselves.  I'm too young to remember college campuses in the 1960's, but would our country really be better off if students there had focused on job skills and not worried about Civil Rights or the Vietnam War?  Should students stick their heads in the sand and shut up about the injustices they perceive in the world?  You know what else is radical?  Following Jesus.  Not saying that you are a Christian, but really and truly following Jesus, living like him.  Thinking and feeling like Jesus, trying to echo his passion and compassion.  Radical activism, when propelled by truly Christ-honoring worldview, is the stuff of legends.  If you seek to starve the activism you don't like (because it is blue not red, or red not blue), you destroy the activism that the world truly needs alongside it.]

To re-ignite public and business confidence in their work, colleges and universities must have a singular focus on preparing students for meaningful jobs and careers. This begins with implementing industry-ready skills-based educational outcomes for their general education curriculum and all academic majors. 

[A singular focus on jobs and careers is the death of Christian Higher Education.]

Colleges and universities should also require internships or apprenticeships for the honing of soft and industry-specifics skills as well as to create employment opportunities. And colleges and universities should require all academic departments to have industry and business partnerships for the continual refinement of curricula and preparation of students for the market.

While there may be additional market-related refinements that could be implemented, there is no doubt that the above initiatives would go a long way to re-igniting our confidence in higher education.

[I understand why business leaders would cheer this essay, workers ready to do their job is what they want the most, but don't we want more out of education than job skills?  Aren't we trying to foster holistic human beings and not just employees that help keep corporate costs low and profits high?]

 The focus on jobs and market preparation must also consider and integrate the enduring questions and answers to what it means to be human. This is what the humanities used to address.

Today, much of the humanities are characterized by a turn toward a contrarianism and deconstructionism that emphasize moral ambiguity and skepticism. Such an approach has resulted in generations of students who at best are sophisticated critics and at worst are radical activists. These students are too often unable to discern, affirm and defend truth and what it means to be human. 

A case in point are the recent protests in which students were clearly unable to discern good from evil. Some college presidents also fared no better. 

Colleges and universities must develop and implement moral skills educational outcomes for their general education curriculum and all academic majors that prepare all students to discern and affirm what is true, beautiful and good.  

[And how will Cornerstone University's students develop these skills without a Humanities Department and with only part-time adjunct professors teaching these classes??  That President Moreno-Riaño has chosen to publicly rail against the Humanities Departments of other unspecified universities while gutting that of his own, one that had been both high class and high quality for generations, is deeply upsetting to alumni such as myself, truly it is heartbreaking.]

All students should also have a significant service requirement during each year of college that is a prerequisite for graduation. This service requirement would be connected to the moral skills outcomes allowing students to apply and refine their moral reasoning and judgment in preparation for life beyond college.

[One brief moment of agreement.  My cross-cultural ministry experience, a month in Guatemala, was a life-changing positive experience.]

Our colleges and universities must educate students with industry skills that position them for great market contributions. This education must also include moral skills that position our students for living a great life characterized by truth, beauty and goodness.  

[At the end of the essay, the idea of truth, beauty, and goodness as part of education is briefly mentioned, but only after declaring that Humanities Departments are what is wrong with higher education, and only in the context of what has happened to Cornerstone University under his tenure.  It rings hollow.]

Both industry and moral skills are essential for our students and for the future of our country, and a serious focus on these would go a long way in re-igniting the confidence in America’s colleges and universities.

[It is sad for me to say it, but I don't have any confidence in Cornerstone University under its current leadership.  I know that good people remain, although many good people have been fired or forced out since President Moreno-Riaño took over, but this current direction is watching a train-wreck in progress.]


To learn much more about how Cornerstone University has been reduced to a shell of its former glory (I don't say that flippantly) through censorship, firing, and politics, please listen to the podcast of Pastor Noah Filipiak a fellow Cornerstone graduate as he interview Dr. David Turner, former professor at the seminary: The Flip Side podcast

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Is Noah all wet? Thoughts on the new movie.



The new Noah movie will undoubtedly upset a variety of Christian because it takes liberty with the text of Genesis by adding some things to fill out the story, and because it changes some things in order to further the plot.  The questions surrounding this movie are similar in many ways to those faced by devoted fans of J.R.R. Tolkien who had to decide if they still liked Peter Jackson’s movies despite the changes he made to the story from the books.  I can understand those who cannot see past the changes to evaluate the movie on its own merit, in both cases, but it would be a mistake not to evaluate this version of the story by its own merits.
            What is the purpose of a movie?  Is it to be a copy of the original source material, be it a book or historical event, or is it to be an interpretation of that source material in its own right?  Movie makers, like novelists, poets, and historians, pick and choose what they wish to emphasize and how they present the material they work with.  When the source material is a beloved novel, historically significant event, or in this case, Sacred Scripture, most viewers are willing to give the writer/director/producer a lot less slack than they would if the material that the movie was derived from is unknown.
            The story of Noah in Genesis, word for word, would not make a good movie.  There isn’t enough material there to fill out a whole movie, and there certainly isn’t enough dialogue.  If you look closely at the account of Noah, the only one talking is God; Noah doesn’t say a word until he wakes up from his drunken stupor to curse his youngest son.  How is a movie, or play, or novel, based upon the life of Noah supposed to portray him if we have no idea what he was thinking or what he said.  In Genesis we’re told that Noah did what the LORD commanded him, but virtually nothing else beyond the background information that he was “a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he walked with God.”  We have absolutely nothing from Genesis about Noah’s wife, his sons, or his daughters-in-law.  In order to turn this story into other medium, things are going to have to be added to the account that we have.  There will be some who disagree with the choices that this particular film makes in that process, but the process is inevitable.  If the most reputable evangelical icon were to make a Noah movie he would have to do the same thing.
            There are also three types of “Christian” movies: those that preach to the choir and tell us the things we already think, feel, and believe; those aimed at Church goers, but designed to challenge us and make us think; and those aimed at the un-churched with the hopes of inspiring them to consider God.  The recent movie, God’s Not Dead is primarily one of the first types; its focus is almost entirely on the choir, with some hopes of speaking to the un-churched, although as I said in my earlier blog post, I think they misfired on that goal.  Noah is a combination of the second two types.  It is designed to make those who already know the story from Sunday school think, and it is likely to cause those who have no idea who Noah was to wonder about God.  If Christians who were hoping that Noah was going to be a message to the choir can let go of that hope and see it on the other two levels, much of their disappointment or anger should be dissipated.
            The “Watchers” in Noah will certainly raise some eyebrows, they reminded me of the Ents in LOTRO, but are actually supposed to be the Nephilim of Genesis 6:4, a term that our English Bibles either translates as “giants” or simply leaves as Nephilim because we have no real idea who/what they were.  That Noah turns them into partially-fallen angels, an idea picked up from the Apocryphal book of Enoch, shouldn’t be viewed harshly when and minister is going to skip this verse when talking about Noah because he has no idea what it means either.
            There will be some people bothered by the environmentalism they see in the movie.  To that I respond that it is sad that evangelicals have allowed politics to turn them against their Biblical mandate to be stewards of the Earth, and have allowed American consumerism to blind them to the living conditions of the poorest on our world that often resemble the Mad Max like conditions portrayed in the movie.  There is a reason why the end of Revelation contains a new heaven and a new earth.
            There will be some who are bothered that the Creation account in the movie, which I found to be visually very beautiful, looked like theistic evolution because there was a clear passage of much time while Noah was talking about each “day”.  Rather than rehash that issue here, let me just point out that it was clear in the movie that God made humanity separate and different, in his own image, and that God was clearly portrayed as the sole maker of all things in the universe, life included.
            The subplot of Noah thinking that God wants him to end the human race raises important theological questions: How does God communicate with man?  How do we know is God is talking to us?  We tend to assume that the heroes of the Bible knew exactly what God wanted of them, all the time, without any doubt, but that is of course not in keeping with our own experience and not a genuine reading of the Bible anyway.
The second question it raises is on that the Bible itself will answer, but only over time.  That question is this: Is there value in each human life?  Is humanity worth saving?  God makes it clear over time, through Abraham’s experience with being asked to sacrifice Isaac, with Moses’ mother protecting him from death, etc. that God cares about human life, and it answers that ultimate value of humanity to God through the promises that God will send a Messiah to redeem humanity, something the New Testament expresses fully.  Was Noah worried that humanity was too far gone to be saved?  I have no idea, the text of Genesis doesn’t tell us anything about what Noah thought, but having lived amongst such violence and wickedness, wouldn’t it be normal to at least think that thought?  If Noah in the movie goes further than you think he should have down that line of reasoning, chalk it up to cinematic suspense building, but don’t dismiss the whole question.  We live in a world where human life is cheap; abortion and euthanasia are but the surface of the problem of devalued human life.  We live after a century in which more than 100 million people were murdered by three separate societies at the hands of three separate dictators during the same generation.  If God could be grieved enough at the behavior of the people of Israel while Moses was on Mt. Sinai that he wanted to wipe them out, then surely Noah could be worried that the humanity of his day was no better and deserved no less.
            There is also a conversation between Noah and his wife in the movie that contains a truth that both Judaism and Christianity would agree with.  She contends that her sons and future grandchildren deserve to live because they aren’t like the people God decided to destroy with the flood.  Noah responds to this by telling her that we aren’t any better.  The people of Israel were holy because God called them out, not because they were better than the Gentiles.  Christians are better because God has saved and cleansed us, not because we were less sinful than the non-repentant. 
            Overall, for those looking to watch a version of the Noah story that is word for word from the Bible, you’ll be disappointed.  For those looking to see a story that contains a God who created the world, including mankind in his image, that cares about that world and is upset enough by the sin committed by humanity to do something about it; you’ll at least by provoked to thinking by Noah even if you don’t enjoy it.  When is the last time someone who doesn’t go to church asked you, “Does God really care that much about sin?”  Or, “Does God care about what’s going on down here?”  If Noah prompts them to do that, isn’t that the perfect opening to share the Good News that Jesus Christ died for the sins of the world?

P.S.  I can tell by many of the online reviews of the movie that many Christians will be veiwing this film through their own political lense, they'll probably chalk this up as an attempt to ruin "our Bible".  The Church isn't a political party, where we get the choice to throw out those we don't like, where we can lose elections (i.e. turn people off to God) on principle and celebrate it.  In case you're wondering, lots of non-believers hated "God's Not Dead" while Christians swooned over it.  Is that the only kind of movie we want to see, one that we like, but that ticks off non-Christians?  Or is there room for a message, even a misguided one, that might open the eyes of those living in darkness?

To read a helpful article about this movie byRev. Robert Barron, click on the link below:
Noah film review

Friday, August 23, 2013

Sermon Video: "think about such things" Philippians 4:8-9

What do we think about each day?  Can we shape our thoughts in order to think about better things?
After explaining that anxiety can be eased through bringing our concerns to God, Paul continues by saying that our thoughts should focus upon things which are, true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent, and praiseworthy.  But how do we do that, how do we avoid negative thoughts and embrace positive ones?  Throughout the Bible, right thinking goes hand in glove with right actions.  If we, as Christians, are going to focus upon the things of God, things like those in Paul's list, we're going to have to do so through our actions.  The more we do things which can be described as true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent, and praiseworthy, the more our minds will be shaped by those actions.  Along those same lines, the more we fill our daily lives with godly things, the less room we will have for negative thoughts as well as temptations toward sinful actions.  As always, this is a group effort of the whole of the Church to be Christ-like, are efforts can and should be together.  This isn't a promise of a life free of anxiety or troubles, the Bible never promises that, but it is the path toward greater Christ-likeness, and that will guarantee, as Paul says, that "the God of peace will be with you."

To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video