While preparing for this week's sermon on Acts 20:13-24, I came across this quote from Matthew Henry's commentary regarding the preaching of the Apostle Paul, although it was written centuries ago, the wisdom of Henry's words remains.
"Ministers must preach the gospel with impartiality; for they are ministers of Christ for the universal church. He was a truly Christian evangelical preacher. He did not preach philosophical notions, or matters of doubtful disputation, nor did he preach politics, or intermeddle at all with affairs of state or the civil government; but he preached faith and repentance, the two great gospel graces, the nature and necessity of them; these he urged upon all occasions."
How much more effective would the Church in the world today be if 100% of its ministers followed this advice? Focus on the Gospel, return to the themes of faith and repentance again and again, let others worry about the affairs of this world, you have been called by God to shepherd his flock, your priority is the sheep.
Showing posts with label Matthew Henry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matthew Henry. Show all posts
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
Tuesday, February 2, 2016
The Gospel, politics, and the poor.
As the American presidential campaign is now fully underway and will continue to be present in the thoughts of many all the way to November, as Christians, we ought to remind ourselves of the teaching of the Gospel, as outlined by Jesus himself, regarding a topic that comes up rather frequently in political debates and speeches: poverty. Which solution to poverty will actually help the most is a matter for ongoing debate, not only among politicians but economists as well, but what our attitude, as Christians, toward those living in poverty ought to be, is not. Our attitude is not optional, we have been commanded, as representatives of the Gospel of grace to treat the poor as Jesus did. The words of the great commentator, Matthew Henry, written in 1721 when the political and economic landscapes were much different, still hold true today for they concern the Gospel's unchanging truths: "Those ought to be relieved by charity whom the providence of God has any way disabled to get their own bread...though there are cheats among such, yet they must not therefore be all thought such."
Why do so many Christians have a negative attitude toward the poor? Is it that we give ourselves credit for our own success in warding off poverty, instead of giving God praise, so therefore we give the poor blame for their failure to avoid poverty, instead of seeing the providence of God at work there as well? If so, our failure is a failure to recognize the authority and power of God. Is it instead fear that motivates our lack of pity, a fear that recognizes that we ourselves could some day live in poverty if our ability to work were to be compromised, so therefore we blame the poor as a way of whistling past the graveyard and pretending we could never be in their worn-out shoes? If so, our failure is that we lack trust in the goodness of God. But perhaps the problem lies deeper, and darker, perhaps the reason that far too many Christians in America are dismissive of the poor, even hostile to the poor, is that we simply are not, as a Church, truly living out the Gospel. We have instead adopted a Gospel-hybrid, mixing it with the American Dream and the promises of capitalism to replace the Gospel's call for a community that helps those in need with the American fixation upon the individual. Maybe we, those who make up the Church, just don't like the poor. Shame upon us to the extent that is true.
Let the politicians say what they will about poverty, we have to get our own house in order, we need to stop blaming the poor for being poor, and start loving them as Christ did, offering them grace and mercy in their time of need, and rejoicing when our effort in his name wins a victory for the kingdom of God.
Why do so many Christians have a negative attitude toward the poor? Is it that we give ourselves credit for our own success in warding off poverty, instead of giving God praise, so therefore we give the poor blame for their failure to avoid poverty, instead of seeing the providence of God at work there as well? If so, our failure is a failure to recognize the authority and power of God. Is it instead fear that motivates our lack of pity, a fear that recognizes that we ourselves could some day live in poverty if our ability to work were to be compromised, so therefore we blame the poor as a way of whistling past the graveyard and pretending we could never be in their worn-out shoes? If so, our failure is that we lack trust in the goodness of God. But perhaps the problem lies deeper, and darker, perhaps the reason that far too many Christians in America are dismissive of the poor, even hostile to the poor, is that we simply are not, as a Church, truly living out the Gospel. We have instead adopted a Gospel-hybrid, mixing it with the American Dream and the promises of capitalism to replace the Gospel's call for a community that helps those in need with the American fixation upon the individual. Maybe we, those who make up the Church, just don't like the poor. Shame upon us to the extent that is true.
Let the politicians say what they will about poverty, we have to get our own house in order, we need to stop blaming the poor for being poor, and start loving them as Christ did, offering them grace and mercy in their time of need, and rejoicing when our effort in his name wins a victory for the kingdom of God.
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
"Sin is a brat that nobody cares to have laid at his doors" - Matthew Henry
I came across this quote from Matthew Henry in his commentary on the failure of Saul to fully obey God in I Samuel 15 as Saul attempts to deflect the responsibility for his own actions onto others. It is an astute and memorable way to speak about mankind's propensity to try to avoid blame. Trying to hide from responsibility or blame others is a tactic that children do not need to be taught, they hope to avoid the negative consequences of their actions, and thus are not above lying to blame others, or pretending ignorance. That parents can see through this charade is clear to adults, and yet as adults, most people continue to try these same sorts of deceptions when trouble comes from a spouse, family member, boss, or the authorities. Saul soon learned from Samuel that such half-repentance is worth nothing with God as he looks upon the heart and knows if true repentance lies within. In that same passage, Matthew Henry also wrote, "it is common for sinners, in excusing their faults, to plead the thoughts and working of their own minds, because those no man can dispute; but they forget that God searches the heart." Seeking to avoid blame is almost an art form in the business and political spheres, and utilizes well paid consultants and lawyers to shape the narrative and massage the truth. It may keep you in office following a scandal, or out of jail after an arrest, but it won't matter a bit when standing before Almighty God. On that day, the only thing that will save us is to have already acknowledged, without reservation, that we are a sinner saved by grace. The brat is ours, the sooner we own up to it, the sooner God can forgive us and begin to transform us.
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
What do we choose to say about people?
How often is what we say to someone else about a third party something good about that person? The news, be it local or national, politics or pop culture, print, TV, radio, or internet tends to focus upon the negative such that there are plenty of people that you or I know about only because of a negative report that we heard about that person. The negative: the scandalous, salacious, and gossip laden grabs our attention, the stories of quiet good being done for selfless reasons get lost in the endless chatter about the latest celebrity, politician, or athlete DUI or overdose.
Aren't we meant for better than this? Shouldn't we be making an effort to uphold and support the good and turn away from, instead of repeating, the bad? The words of Matthew Henry on this topic ring true, "What is good in men we should take all occasions to speak of and often repeat it, what is evil we should make mention of but sparingly, and no more than is needful."
Think about the last few conversations you've had where you talked about a third party to somebody...How often did you focus on the good, sharing encouragement and thanking God, how often did you pass along gossip, take guilty pleasure in the misfortune of others, or simply laugh at their expense? The things that we choose to say about other people, say an awful lot about us too.
Aren't we meant for better than this? Shouldn't we be making an effort to uphold and support the good and turn away from, instead of repeating, the bad? The words of Matthew Henry on this topic ring true, "What is good in men we should take all occasions to speak of and often repeat it, what is evil we should make mention of but sparingly, and no more than is needful."
Think about the last few conversations you've had where you talked about a third party to somebody...How often did you focus on the good, sharing encouragement and thanking God, how often did you pass along gossip, take guilty pleasure in the misfortune of others, or simply laugh at their expense? The things that we choose to say about other people, say an awful lot about us too.
Tuesday, October 14, 2014
When warnings go unheeded
“No marvel that hardened sinners are not frightened from sin
and to repentance by the threatening of misery in another world, which is
future and out of sight, when the certain prospect of misery in this world, the
sinking of their estates and the ruin of their healths, will not restrain them
from vicious courses.” This is from
Matthew Henry’s Bible commentary, the passage he’s commenting upon is 2
Chronicles 21 where King Jehoram is confronted by a letter from the prophet
Elijah predicting woe to him personally and to his kingdom because of his
exceedingly great wickedness (he murdered his six brothers). Henry is correct to note that the
consequences of sin are not wholly relegated to judgment after death, we see
what choosing to embrace evil does to humanity day after day. The truth that virtue is its own reward, and
your sin fill find you, out is clear for anyone willing to look at it, but
ignored by those whose hearts are unwilling to admit their error and seek God’s
forgiveness. This is clearly a flaw in
our fallen human nature, something that we will always have to strive against,
and the reason why Plato’s simply solution of educating everyone on right and
wrong is insufficient to create a better world.
In Plato’s mind, “to know the good is to do the good”. Sadly, as Henry correctly points out, there
have always been people willing to ignore what they can plainly see. As it always does, grace rescues humanity
from itself when God intervenes, first through sending Christ to make the way
possible, and now each time when he calls through the Spirit to break through
our resistance and blindness. The
warning of future judgment is still necessary, and the pointing out of present
consequences still appropriate, but we also need to remember that such things
will not always be sufficient to turn the sinner from his/her self-destructive
path; there but for the grace of God go I.
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Avoiding the fool's bargain
While working on my
sermon for this week, I was reading Matthew Henry’s commentary on II Chronicles
that was written in 1708. The text tells
of Levites who left their homes and land in the northern ten tribes of Israel
and migrated south to Judah because their new king, Jeroboam, had replaced
worship of the LORD with idolatry in order to keep his people from going to
Jerusalem to worship. Jeroboam’s
political decision proved to be utterly disastrous as it started Israel down a
road of moral decline that ended in the destruction of the kingdom in 722 at
the hands of the Assyrians. The Levites,
seeing that they were no longer welcome, and that they could not continue to
serve God as they had done, decided to leave the land that had been given to
support them while they ministered. It
was a costly decision for them, one that took away a certain income and left
them hoping for the best in a new land.
It was also clearly a wise and brave decision, to choose morality over
money, a choice that continues to be put before God's people in our world today as it was when Matthew
Henry commented on the decision of the Levites three hundred years ago. In response to their choice, Henry wrote, “No
secular advantages whatsoever should draw us thither, or detain us there, where
we are in danger of making shipwreck of faith and good conscience.” Whether that advantage is money, fame, or
influence, it just isn’t worth it. To
risk your reputation, your honor, and your faith in God for such things will
always be a fool’s bargain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)