Militant 'Christian' Nationalism in the halls of Congress: An affront to the true Gospel

 

Rep. Andy Ogles (center), Def. Sec. Hegseth (left), Sec. State Rubio (right) - AI image, 3/23/26

Yesterday, Congressman Andy Ogles (TN) posted to social media an AI generated image with ominous music featuring himself as the lead Knights Templar Crusader flanked by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State with the caption, "This is a battle of good vs evil. We must reaffirm that our nation was built on Christian principles."  Perhaps the Congressman was trolling online, perhaps he was seeking to raise his own profile (in one day it has generated a million views on FB), or maybe he is wholly earnest.  Whatever the exact motivation, the end result is clear enough: Glorifying violence done by the United States of America, at home or abroad, as violence done in the name of God.  Rep. Ogles is claiming that he and those on his team represent good, and whomever it is that he is crusading against represents evil.

The sad truth is, hundreds of similar examples in word, iconography, and deed can be found portraying American politics as a battle between good and evil, the worst of them invoking the name of Jesus, the Cross, or God in general in behalf of their side and/or against their enemies.

As the Knights Templar imagery demonstrates, this thought process is not new.  That Christians, or at least self-professed Christians, have justified their violence and/or hatred in the name of God in past generations doesn't make it any less blasphemous now, nor any less harmless to the true Gospel message of salvation and redemption for all, regardless of race, ethnicity, nationality, gender, or any other label, by grace (alone) through faith (alone) in Christ (alone).

God is not an American, and neither is Jesus.  America is not ancient Israel, we have no covenant with God as a nation.  God is not on our side, for his kingdom is not of this world.  Whoever wishes to be great in the kingdom of God must be the servant of all.  The true triumph of the Gospel is self-sacrifice, not destroying one's enemies.

We've been down this road before, it has never ended without tragedy and without reputational harm to the Church and the Gospel.  The further we continue down this path in this generation, sowing the same seeds, the more bitter the harvest will be.

Sermon Video: Will Esau Forgive Jacob? - Genesis 32-33

As the moment of truth approaches, Jacob prepares to meet his estranged brother with a multi-step plan designed to mollify Esau's anger.  But will it work, or does Esau intend to kill his brother as he vowed twenty years ago?

In the end, it isn't Jacob's planning that makes a difference, but the change in Esau's heart that God wrought.  When Esau sees Jacob he rushes to embrace him (as in the Prodigal Son) with tears.

We have been given the ministry of reconciliation by Jesus, the forgiveness that Esau gave to Jacob reminds us how powerful this task can be.

"How the Gospels Should Have Ended" - D. Lancaster (FFOZ), The Gospels are God's 'Plan B'??? - response by Pastor Powell

"How the Gospels Should Have Ended" - rebuttal part 1 (of 2)

Daniel Lancaster of First Fruits of Zion thinks so.  In this pro-Torah fan fiction version of the Gospels, Lancaster imagines a better version of Jesus' story that sees him crowned King Messiah by a people who follow him back to Torah observance.  

Chief among the many questions this perversion of the Gospel story raises is this: It has not time for Gospel proclamation to the Gentiles.  No Great Commission, no giving of the Holy Spirit.  What does Lancaster envision instead for the Gentiles?  God's wrath, immediately poured forth after the resurrection of Jesus (killed by the Romans after God lets them slaughter the Jewish people who had trusted in Jesus).

In the end, FFOZ hopes that guilt over the "failure" of Jesus' generation to embrace the Torah (i.e. the better version of the Gospel story) will prompt people today to take up Torah observance as the means of "hastening" the return of Christ.  The hubris to think they can change the timing of God's plan is astounding.

To read the whole article: How the Gospels Should Have Ended - D. Lancaster

"How the Gospels Should Have Ended" - rebuttal part 2 (of 2)

Sermon Video: Laban Confronts Jacob - Genesis 31:19-15

 

Jacob's choice to abruptly leave with his family and property without even informing Laban prompts Jacob's father-in-law to pursue him.  When Laban catches-up with Jacob he confronts him and both men air their grievances with each other.

In the end, the relationship between Jacob and Laban is beyond repair, especially when both men continue to insist they are in the right.  God intervenes to prevent the situation from ending in violence, but sadly not harming each other is the only thing they will commit to. 

The episode serves as a reminder of the consequences of schemes, deception, and grudges.  For Jacob, it serves as a stark reminder of what might await him when he is confronted by Esau.

Sermon Video: Jacob turns the tables on Laban - Genesis 30:25-31:18

 

In this chapter of his life story, Jacob's relationship with his father-in-law Laban deteriorates, eventually breaking.  Both men are to blame, as both seek to cheat the other.  In the end, Jacob is successful in obtaining most of Laban's wealth, and then leaves with his wives and children to head back to Canaan.