Showing posts with label Charismatic Movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charismatic Movement. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 23, 2022

The Watchman Decree: 'Christian' Nationalism's 'name it and claim it' dangerous prayer

The following 'decree' was written by pastor Dutch Sheets, a member of the New Apostolic Reformation, a loosely affiliated group of Charismatic Christians who believe in Dominionism, which in a nutshell is the belief that God has given the Church the authority to take control of the Earth from Satan and we need only claim it.  The following prayer thus contains the expected 'name it and claim it' style of some of the Charismatic movement, combined with a stark American 'Christian' Nationalism that venerates the American Constitution to idolatrous levels.  My comments interspersed below will be in bold.  To view the decree as a pdf: The Watchman Decree

[What is Dominionism?  As explained by self-appointed apostle Peter Wagner, a founder of the NAR movement, before his death in 2016, “Dominion has to do with control. Dominion has to do with rulership. Dominion has to do with authority and subduing. And it relates to society. In other words, what the values are in Heaven need to be made manifest on earth. Dominion means being the head and not the tail. Dominion means ruling as kings.”]

WATCHMAN DECREE

As a Patriot of faith, I attest my allegiance first and foremost to the kingdom of God and the Great

Commission. Secondly, I agree to be a watchman over our nation concerning its people and their

rights to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness—

From the beginning the decree defines a "patriot of faith" as someone who puts allegiance to the Kingdom of God and the Great Commission first, but in the very next sentence that line is blurred beyond recognition.  The "Watchman" analogy is taken from Ezekiel 33 where the prophet is told that he must warm his countrymen of impending danger lest their fate be on his head if he keep silent.  While it would be an acceptable interpretation of the principle behind this text to say that Christians have a responsibility to warn the Church of impending danger, it is NOT in keeping with Ezekiel's prophecy to say that Christians bear this responsibility for America.  Why?  Israel was a covenant people, a theocracy, where God had a specific and detailed set of blessings and curses that were derived from the commands the people had agreed to obey.  Ezekiel's responsibility flows out of this context.  Israel knew what God required of them, their ancestors had committed themselves to obeying it.  In the Church Age, God has made no such relationship with ANY nation/country/people.  It is clear that the members of the NAR, as 'Christian' Nationalists, have assumed God has indeed made a promise to America akin to that which he made with Israel, unfortunately for them (and the Church, the Gospel, and our nation) scripture makes not such promise...A question that has no answer: When, where, how, and with whom did God make a covenant with America?  What are its stipulations, what is demanded of us and what is promised by God?  A covenant isn't implied, it has to be spelled out and agreed upon.

In addition, the responsibilities of the Watchman are linked in the decree to "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness", things that Ezekiel was most certainly not focused upon nor would they have made any sense to him, for where in this list is righteousness or faith?  Already the Declaration of Independence has replaced the Bible as the guide by which we are called to act.

WHEREAS

• we, the Church, are God’s governing Body on the earth

This is the foundational assertion of the text, but it is in no way made in Scripture.  Jesus calls his disciples to be "salt and light", to sacrifice and to serve, in no way does he, or any other apostolic source, command the Church to govern the earth.  Search in vain for the source of this claim in scripture, it isn't there.  This is 'Christian' Nationalism's bold lust for power, power we are not commanded to seek, and power we are not capable of wielding morally.  {See: Tolkien's LOTR and what the Ring does to those who think they can wield it for good.  Tolkien was a Christian with an orthodox Christian worldview, and it shows.}

• we have been given legal power from heaven and now exercise our authority

Legal power?  This seems to be setting the groundwork to place 'Christian' Nationalism above the law in America, ironic given all of the veneration here about the Constitution.

• we are God’s ambassadors and spokespeople over the earth

Even a phrase at first glance like this that seems orthodox has a flaw.  The Church is Christ's steward/ambassador on the earth, not over it.  Subtle, but it fits the pattern of seeking dominion and power over others.

• through the power of God, we are the world influencers

World influencers?  Does God need extra social media likes and clicks?  What a strange phrase.  The Church is called to do justice and love mercy, what this has to do with being a 'world influencer' is a mystery.

• because of our covenant with God, we are equipped and delegated by Him to destroy every

attempted advance of the enemy,

Again we have a dangerous bit of bravado here.  Is the Church capable of overcoming the Gates of Hell, absolutely, Jesus promised that, but that ultimate victory and this bold claim are far apart.  The Church (and Christians) will also suffer defeat, persecution, and loss in this world.

Who is the "our" that has a covenant with God?  The Christians in America, or America itself?  As the text later in the declaration shows, they mean the latter.

WE MAKE OUR DECLARATIONS:

1. We decree that America’s executive branch of government will honor God and defend the

Constitution.

There is an assumption here that American 'Christian' Nationalism makes: God wrote the Constitution (to one degree or other), therefore whatever the Constitution claims {please ignore for the moment the 3/5th human beings part} is equal to the will of God.  This is, frankly, blasphemy.  {See: Mark Meadows, Ginni Thomas, and the blasphemy of thinking God is on your side. or The blasphemous "One Nation Under God" painting by Jon McNaughton}

2. We decree that our legislative branch (Congress) will write only laws that are righteous and

constitutional.

Again, righteous laws do NOT equal constitutional laws, although that link is implied strongly here.  One can write a constitutional law that falls far short of being righteous, believe me America history has plenty of examples, it can in fact be immoral in every way and pass constitutional muster.

3. We decree that our judicial system will issue rulings that are biblical and constitutional.

The not subtle linkage continues, now biblical and constitutional are together.

4. We declare that we stand against wokeness, the occult and every evil attempt against our

nation.

Thus this form of 'Christian' Nationalism is for one political party only, those connected to the pejorative 'woke' need not apply, God isn't interested (evidently) in your concerns.  {For a refutation see: Is God Woke? The answer should matter to you or Beware of the Political Church: John MacArthur declares, "any real true believer" can only vote one way.}

5. We declare and we now take back our God-given freedoms, according to our Constitution.

Which begs the question: Which God-given freedoms found in the Constitution do they not now have?  

6. We declare that we take back influence at the local level in our communities.

7. We decree that we take back and permanently control positions of influence and leadership in

each of the *Seven Mountains.

There is a vast difference in a pluralistic society between influence, which all individuals and groups have a right to aspire to, and control that precludes the rights of others.  'Christian' Nationalism isn't the only movement/philosophy seeking such domination over others, but it very clearly is on the list.

8. We decree that the blood of Jesus covers and protects our nation. It protects and separates us

for God.

Where in any orthodox and historic understanding of the work of Christ upon the Cross, of the efficacy of his shed blood, does the idea that Jesus' blood protects our nation, specifically, come from?  Are they claiming that Jesus shed his blood for America?  For a kingdom of this world?  Again, blasphemy is not too strong a term for this.  The shed blood of Jesus separates America for God's purposes?  Why this nation and not another?  Why only this nation?  There is a massive prideful exceptionalism at work here.

9. We declare that our nation is energy independent.

Ezekiel is scratching his head at this one.  What does being a Watchman on behalf of your people have to do with energy policy?  Nothing.  Best to move on than ponder why this made the cut.

10. We declare that America is strong spiritually, financially, militarily and technologically.

There are questions about all four of them being true, at times, but especially the first one.  America is spiritually strong?  By what metric?  Declining church attendance and membership?  The rampant sexual immorality and materialism among those who call themselves Christians?  The willingness of self-professed Christians to violate any and all of God's commands in order to gain the power to 'take back America for God'?... In addition, proclaiming that America's military is part of the equation harkens back to the worst parts of Church History: The Crusades and the Thirty Years War.

11. We decree that evil carries no power, authority or rights in our land nor over our people.

And yet it most clearly does.  America is a far more violent nation that fellow Western democracies, to name one way in which evil is more than comfortable in this land.  

12. We decree that we will operate in unity, going beyond denominational lines in order to

accomplish the purposes of God for our nation.

I can actually get behind this one.  I'm all for ecumenical efforts to do Kingdom work, if only they meant this about things other than 'winning' the Culture War and crushing their enemies.

13. And we decree that AMERICA SHALL BE SAVED!

Again, in what portion of scripture is this folly grounded?  America doesn't need to be saved because America is a nation not a person.  Millions of its people need to be saved because they are not in relationship with God through Christ, but that is not what they're talking about here at all.  If the preamble declaring loyalty to the Kingdom of God first meant anything at all, #13 would never have been written.  If you watch the video, this line is shrieked with fierce intensity.  This is the sad truth of 'Christian' Nationalism, the nation's success is the only thing that truly calls forth passion and sacrifice (or violence, the sacrifice is often asked of others). 

America, in fact, cannot be saved.  Not a single kingdom of this world will continue after the return of Christ.  When Jesus establishes his kingdom each and every nation on the planet will be obsolete.  In reality, we have no idea when that day will come, and the United States of America may be just as much a distant memory as the Byzantine Empire by that point.  It may sound like a broken record, but God's purpose in this world is NOT to elevate America, if the Kingdom of God advances while America teeters and falls, so be it.  The prayer is 'thy kingdom come, thy will be done,' not 'our kingdom win, no matter what it costs.'

We know this country was founded on Judeo-Christian principles.

We know the truth; therefore, we stand for truth and will NEVER be deceived!

The endless debate about how much of America's founding is connected to Judeo-Christian principles, as opposed to the also influential Enlightenment, for example, is a red herring that nevertheless invokes strong passions and anger.

We will NEVER stop fighting!

We will NEVER, EVER, EVER give up or give in!

And if this isn't God's will, what then?  Is the only path forward for the Kingdom to fight??  What if this never ending fight is ruining the witness of the Gospel (hint: it already is), must the fight continue no matter the cost?

We WILL take our country back.

Who has the country now?  How will we know when 'we' have it back?  If our team controls the White House, Congress, and the Supreme Court, is the war over?  FYI, this happened between 2016-2018, and yet the Culture War continued to rage, the warning that 'they' were coming to get 'us' and destroy America didn't slack one bit.  'We' won elections, and yet the war continues unabated, how can this be when political power is the end to which immoral means are being excused?

We WILL honor the ONE TRUE GOD, the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob!

Good, please do.  While you're at it, read his book and see how he wants to be honored.

AMERICA SHALL BE SAVED!

Aside from the general overuse of caps in this decree, which matches up well with the way in which this prayer is shouted in the video, this once more underscores the way in which 'Christian' Nationalism is a diversion from what God actually told his people to do, the Great Commission, to what he never told them to do, seize geopolitical power for themselves.

“Working together with Him, we strongly urge you not to receive God’s grace in vain [by turning

away from sound doctrine and His merciful kindness]. For He says, ‘At the acceptable time (the

time of grace) I listened to you, and I helped you on the day of salvation.’ Behold, now is ‘the

acceptable time,’ behold, now is ‘the day of salvation.’” 2 Corinthians 6:1-2 (AMP)

*Seven Mountains of Influence include media, business/finance,

family, education, politics, arts/entertainment and religion

In the end, this decree, despite being a frightening display of non-biblical theology that ignores the warnings of Church History, serves as a clear example of what 'Christian' Nationalism is, what it aims for, and why Christians should not only have no part in it, but also oppose it.

We have seen a shift in the past several years, now members of Congress and their allies who claim to represent Christianity, are willing to call themselves Christian Nationalists.  They're willing to say, "what's so bad about wanting Judeo-Christian values to prevail?" without dealing with the reality that the prevailing in question is a matter of domination not persuasion, of coercion not repentance.  As a Baptist I shudder to see so many fellow Christians, people whose service to others over the years demonstrates that their faith is genuine, being deceived by this path, and I shudder to see that history's lessons are being ignored once again.  "Power tends to corrupt, absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely." - Lord Acton.  The Church is not an exception to this rule.

{Note: Many of the same people leading the NAR and the politicians they support are also deeply connected to QAnon, as a reminder: QAnon's kidnapping and “adrenochroming of children” is just repackaging the medieval antisemitic Blood Libel, the whole movement must be utterly rejected.

In addition, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene is a favorite of NAR apostles: "Satan controlling the Church"? Marjorie Taylor Greene's dangerous view of Catholic Relief Services assistance to migrants

The NAR were also deeply involved in the blasphemous Jericho March on January 5th of 2020: The downward spiral of Bonhoeffer biographer Eric Metaxas

And, for further understanding of the NAR, Paula White Cain is the most famous person in this mold: Paula White:The Prosperity Gospel, Celebrity, and Politics - A trifecta of Gospel compromise or Paula White: Charlatan, Heretic, and White House employee - terrifying in any administration}

The following is a link to a deeply researched article on the NAR's connections to politicians, militias, and hucksters, while I do not vouch for the accuracy of each claim and connection, there are a host of evidentiary photos, links, and articles: Underreported And Massive Theocratic Movement Joins Forces With Michael Flynn And Roger Stone A tour featuring “Seven Mountains” Christian dominionists, Flynn, and Stone is coming to Pennsylvania. - by Jennifer Cohn}

Friday, January 15, 2021

The Problem with claiming to be a Prophet: What happens when you're wrong?

I'll confess up front, I'm not comfortable with charismatic expressions of Christianity, never have been.  They don't fit well with either the more stoic tendency of my personality, nor the analytical nature of my thinking.  In fact, in high school I was asked by one of my best friends to accompany him to a charismatic church service because he was interested in a girl but nervous about going to her church.  Baptists are in many ways adjacent to the Charismatic Movement.  A  minority of the people in our churches like to lift their hands when singing, some like to respond to the prayers of others out loud with "Yes, Jesus!" and the like, this affinity is typically even more pronounced among our majority Black congregations.  In my mind, there has always been a significant divide between enthusiastic worship expressions (more of a personality thing) and manifestations of the Spirit like speaking in tongues or faith healing (a question of theology).

Which brings us to recent events and the question of prophets.  You may or may not be aware of it, but a number of prominent "Prophets" in the Charismatic Movement predicted that Donald Trump would win the 2020 election.  Given that there were only two real possibilities, and the advantage that Republicans have thanks to the Electoral College, that was at least a 50/50 shot.  But he didn't win.  Now what?

Until yesterday I had never heard of Jeremiah Johnson of North Carolina, although he has 60k followers on Facebook which is about 6,000 times as many as follow me.  Jeremiah Johnson was one of the ministers who predicted that President Trump would be reelected, evidently because of a dream in which he also predicted that the Dodgers would win the World Series this year, and Amy Coney Barrett would be elevated to the Supreme Court.  As Meatloaf famously said, "Two out of three ain't bad".  Except when it comes to prophecy it isn't.  Two out of three is as bad as two out of one hundred when you claim to be a prophet, we're not talking about stock tips or guessing answers while watching Jeopardy.  Prophecy is supposed to be the sharing of communication from Almighty God, since God exists outside of time as the Alpha and Omega, how can true prophecy every be wrong?  There's the rub.  True prophets are always right if what they're given by God is a prediction concerning the future.  Their words may unfold in unexpected ways, or at unexpected times, but they never fail because true prophets speak God's words and His Word is forever True.

How did Jeremiah Johnson respond to his error?  He actually did the right thing and repented of leading his flock astray on this issue, and took a step back from his involvement in politics with some introspection.  He also notably didn't blame Christians for failing to pray hard enough to 'make God's will happen' (there's a number of theological questions about that notion that are prickly), or tell them to cling to the false hope that the election results will be miraculously changed in the next few days (as some false prophets continue to do).  The result of this public apology and willingness to admit error?

"Over the last 72 hours, I have received multiple death threats and thousands upon thousands of emails from Christians saying the nastiest and most vulgar things I have ever heard toward my family and ministry. I have been labeled a coward, sellout, a traitor to the Holy Spirit, and cussed out at least 500 times. We have lost ministry partners every hour and counting.

After publicly repenting on January 7th, I fully expected to be called a false prophet etc in some circles but I could have never dreamed in my wildest imagination that so much satanic attack and witchcraft would come from charismatic/prophetic people. I have been flabbergasted at the barrage of continued conspiracy theories being sent every minute our way and the pure hatred being unleashed. 

To my great heartache, I’m convinced parts of the prophetic/charismatic movement are far SICKER than I could have ever dreamed of. I truthfully never realized how absolutely triggered and ballistic thousands and thousands of saints get about Donald Trump. It’s terrifying! It’s full of idolatry!"

Jeremiah Johnson's FB feed, the post quoted is from 1/10/21

Jeremiah Johnson's public apology

When you mix false prophecy with fervent political partisanship, the resulting concoction is highly volatile, like nitro glycerin, shaking it is not recommended.  Rather than focus on the question of how so many 'Christians' can justify such hate in the name of Christ, let us ponder the question of prophetic error.  

What does scripture say about the prophets who predict rightly versus prophets whose word fails?

1. Prophets who try to lead the people away from God will not be tolerated.

Deuteronomy 13:1-5  If a prophet, or one who foretells by dreams, appears among you and announces to you a sign or wonder, 2 and if the sign or wonder spoken of takes place, and the prophet says, “Let us follow other gods” (gods you have not known) “and let us worship them,” 3 you must not listen to the words of that prophet or dreamer. The Lord your God is testing you to find out whether you love him with all your heart and with all your soul. 4 It is the Lord your God you must follow, and him you must revere. Keep his commands and obey him; serve him and hold fast to him. 5 That prophet or dreamer must be put to death for inciting rebellion against the Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt and redeemed you from the land of slavery. That prophet or dreamer tried to turn you from the way the Lord your God commanded you to follow. You must purge the evil from among you.

2. God's people are to reject false prophets whose predictions fail to come true.

Deuteronomy 18:14-2214  The nations you will dispossess listen to those who practice sorcery or divination. But as for you, the Lord your God has not permitted you to do so. 15 The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among you, from your fellow Israelites. You must listen to him. 16 For this is what you asked of the Lord your God at Horeb on the day of the assembly when you said, “Let us not hear the voice of the Lord our God nor see this great fire anymore, or we will die.”

17 The Lord said to me: “What they say is good. 18 I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their fellow Israelites, and I will put my words in his mouth. He will tell them everything I command him. 19 I myself will call to account anyone who does not listen to my words that the prophet speaks in my name. 20 But a prophet who presumes to speak in my name anything I have not commanded, or a prophet who speaks in the name of other gods, is to be put to death.”

21 You may say to yourselves, “How can we know when a message has not been spoken by the Lord?” 22 If what a prophet proclaims in the name of the Lord does not take place or come true, that is a message the Lord has not spoken. That prophet has spoken presumptuously, so do not be alarmed.

3.  True or false prophets can also be recognized by their morality.

Matthew 7:15-20  “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16 By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them.

4. The claim of being a prophet is no guarantee of a right standing with God.

Matthew 7:22  Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’

5. False prophets are expected and will deceive many.

Matthew 24:24  For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.

6. The true prophet speaks for God alone, not himself.

2 Peter 1:20  Above all, you must understand that no prophecy of Scripture came about by the prophet’s own interpretation of things.

I certainly don't know Jeremiah Johnson well enough to know where he went wrong, his public confession feels like at least a step in the right direction of correcting that error, but in general anyone who claims to be a prophet, that is someone SPEAKING FOR GOD, whose word turns out to be a lie, should clearly be rejected as a prophet.  As I pastor I sometimes misspeak, and I sometimes say things in error, but I've never claimed extra authority as a prophet to tell my congregation a word directly from God.  Those who claim greater authority must accept greater responsibility {Peter Parker's Uncle Ben said something like that}.  The scriptures repeatedly warn the people of God against trusting false prophets.  Israel had to contend with them on a massive scale, both those claiming to speak for the LORD when they did not, and those representing false gods like the prophets of Ba'al that the true prophet Elijah humiliated and then had put to death.  The Church too is warned of the prevalence of false prophets and the need to weigh what someone claiming to speak for God is saying to determine if it is true.

There is a vast difference between attempting to interpret the revealed Word of God enshrined in scripture, what I and many like me attempt to do each week, and presenting yourself as someone with a direct connection to God's words here and now.  When I fail, that's on me, because a correct interpretation of the scriptural passage in question has no doubt been made by many during the history of the Church, but when the supposed prophet fails, that failure calls into question the veracity of God, threatens the faith of those who have followed that prophetic voice, and brings the name of God into disrepute.  To falsely prophecy is no small thing and is in fact extremely troubling, but it should serve as a severe warning to the Charismatic Movement within the Christian Church that Jeremiah Johnson received death threats and profanity laced tirades when he admitted he was wrong, not from those who felt betrayed because they had wrongly trusted him when he was wrong, but for admitting his mistake, from those who would rather believe a false prophecy than objective reality.