A look at the Garden of Eden from the perspective of what it would have meant to the ancient Israelites (it owes much to Professor John's Walton's, The Lost World of Adam and Eve), it isn't the same as what most of us were taught. Adam and Eve are real people, but are they the only people that were alive at the time? Also, why is the Garden a paradise, what makes it that way, and what does this have to do with human mortality? The answers offered are not dogmatic, simply an attempt to understand this text as it was originally intended.
Tuesday, May 14, 2024
Wednesday, April 24, 2024
Torah Club lesson #8 leans into the mysticism of Kabbalah
Note the terms: World of Concealment and World of Truth |
Note Lancaster's description of demons and angels contending over the souls of the dead |
One of the things that jumps out if you read The Beginning of Wisdom Torah Club series one after another (as I've done in order to point out the concrete examples of extra-biblical and unorthodox teachings they contain) is how much Daniel Lancaster relies upon the Wisdom of Solomon. The Wisdom of Solomon was likely written by someone in the Alexandrian Jewish community in the generations leading up to the birth of Jesus, and it was subsequently included in the Greek translation of the Jewish scriptures known as the Septuagint (or LXX). As a text, it contains ideas derived both from Jewish thought and Greek Platonic philosophy, which isn't surprising given that Alexandria was a renowned center of Greek philosophical thought for centuries. In addition to this influence, which is something the Early Church would have been very familiar with, for it both embraced Greek philosophy on some matters, and contended against it in others {Gnostic Dualism being the most famous antagonist}, Lancaster also weaves into the Torah Club materials medieval Jewish mysticism in the form of Kabbalah.
Now, I'll be the first to tell you that Jewish medieval mysticism is not a topic that has ever been on my list of things that I need to study as a disciple of Jesus, then again, neither has Islamic Sufism or the various forms of mysticism that have operated under the guise of Christianity. The idea that the path to divine knowledge is through mystical experience is foreign to those of us who embrace the Reformation's proclamation of Sola Scriptura (Scripture Alone). Why? Because it cannot be replicated, it cannot be evaluated, and it cannot be questioned. If someone tells you they had a mystical experience where God told them that the human soul is protected from demons trying to take it to hell after death by an angelic force {as Lancaster does in this Torah Club lesson}, what is the rebuttal? Mystical knowledge is, by definition, only available to those who experience it, and at the same time due to its dream-like nature, open to broad interpretation.
In this case Daniel Lancaster is teaching that the "insights" of Jewish mysticism are in fact true, more than that, that these ideas can be used as the rubric that explains holy scripture. Therein lies the growing danger, "because the Jewish mystics say so" is not any safer a path to follow for a disciple of Jesus than, "because the Christian mystics say so." In the end, God's Word has never required mystical experience to be understood. Whenever people, well meaning or otherwise, have tried to impose upon it allegorical interpretation or mystical knowledge, the results have been to take those who listen to them away from the plain meaning of the text. If the plain meaning of the text, that available to the educated and uneducated alike, to the novice as well as to the veteran, was what this path desired, there would be no need for arbitrary allegorical or mystical insights. Where does it stop? If the "sages" that Lancaster likes to cite (but never seems to actually quote) deny the resurrection of Jesus, is that out-of-bounds? Is that a bride-too-far, or are these supposed wise men to be followed wherever they lead? We've already seen a willingness from Lancaster and FFOZ to abandon the Trinity because it doesn't fit their new "gospel," is there reason to believe that any of the truths that our ancestors in the faith were willing to die for aren't also up for grabs?
In case you are wondering, if you are a follower of Jesus Christ, someone who has been redeemed by the blood of the Lamb and given the new birth of the Holy Spirit, NOTHING can separate you from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord (Romans 8), so there is a zero percent chance that demonic forces would need to be thwarted by angels to allow your soul to ascend to heaven. That's utter nonsense because Jesus has already conquered sin and death, therefore the spiritual forces of evil do not contend with Jesus, they flee from him.
Note: This entire premise of Lancaster is once again built upon the assumption of a pre-existent human soul, an idea repeated as if it were fact in this Torah Club lesson as well, and an idea that was condemned as heresy at the Second Council of Constantinople AD 553.
Tuesday, April 11, 2023
Sermon Video: Christ arose, we too will be raised - 1 Corinthians 15:20-23
Of the many blessings and joys that the resurrection of Jesus from the dead brings to those who believe in him, one that we will all need some day is the assurance that he has opened up for us a path from death to new life. Because Jesus has risen from the dead, we too will rise. This wonderful truth offers us comfort in our times of sorrow, strength in our times of trial, and puts away fear of the future.
Monday, November 21, 2022
Sermon Video: The Gospel in a nutshell - Romans 6:23
The Gospel in one sentence. Think about that for a moment. God's plan to redeem humanity from sin and death, to turn humanity history from a tragedy into a triumph, can be summed up in one sentence. Romans 6:23 does this beautifully, and in it virtually word is worth our pondering.
Sunday, October 30, 2022
Sermon Video: "we are those who have died to sin" - Romans 5:20-6:7
Having explained that we have died with Christ, and been raised together with him to new life, the Apostle Paul explores how we then should live now. The first question is: Should we go on sinning? To which he answers, "By no means!" Why not? Because we have "died to sin", it no longer has the mastery over us. With the Holy Spirit's power, we can have victory over sin. It won't be totally removed in this life, but that 'old self' is gone and buried.
Monday, October 24, 2022
Sermon Video: Death and Life, from the one to the many: Adam and Jesus, Romans 5:12-19
Paul compares how death spread from Adam to all of humanity, with all of humanity joining Adam in sin, to how life can spread from Jesus to all who put their trust in him, sharing in his righteousness.
Monday, March 7, 2022
Sermon Video: The Resurrection of Jesus - Mark 16:1-8
Much of what we hear and read about in life is colored by hyperbole. The greatest and most turns out to be a pitch. Not so the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. This moment is the turning point of all history, not just human history, history itself. Why? Because this is the moment that humanity's two biggest problems, sin and death, were dealt a blow that will ultimately prove fatal. It was also the moment that God's plan of reconciliation and renewal for all of Creation passed the point of no return; nothing can stop the final victory of Jesus and the triumph of his Church.
What is our response to this Good News? Share it! Tells others, bring hope and joy to places of darkness and despair.
Sunday, October 18, 2020
Sermon Video: Make use of what God has given - Mark 4:21-25
In a series of 4 connected sayings, Jesus explains the nature of the world that God created, emphasizing that the Truth is intended to be disclosed and that both the righteous path toward God and the wicked path away from God are self-reinforcing. Why? Because that's the nature of reality. The universe has a moral law just as much as it has a natural one. Moving toward God is light and life, moving away is darkness and death; it cannot be otherwise because apart from God there is nothing.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Friday, July 31, 2020
How should Christians act during a pandemic? - Wisdom from Martin Luther's experience with the Plague
On August 2nd, 1527, the bubonic plague (Black Death) returned to the German city of Wittenberg. Many of the town's residents fled (the students and faculty of the University were advised to flee the city), but Martin Luther stayed put. 1527 was 10 years after the posting of Luther's famous 95 thesis, 6 years after Luther was excommunicated in 1521, the same year that he defended his beliefs before the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V at the Diet of Worms.
The risk of staying to Luther and his family was not insubstantial. While his wife Katie survived a bout of the Plague while pregnant with the family's second child, the girl Elisabeth died in infancy before her eighth month (perhaps weakened by the Plague, perhaps not).
An English translation of the text of Luther's letter in its entirety may be read here: Whether One May Flee From A Deadly Plague - by Martin Luther. Relevant excerpts will appear below in italics with my commentary in bold. Three factors to consider when weighing Luther's words: (1) The way in which the plague spread was little understood, except that contact with those infected was dangerous. (2) There was little in the way of efficacious treatments with death rates as high as 30%, and (3) there was no system of hospitals to care for the sick, if family or friends could not help, the sick would die alone.
Grace and peace from God our Father and our Lord Jesus Christ. Your letter, sent to me at Wittenberg, was received some time ago. You wish to know whether it is proper for a Christian to run away from a deadly plague. I should have answered long ago, but God has for some time disciplined and scourged me so severely that I have been unable to do much reading or writing. Furthermore, it occurred to me that God, the merciful Father, has endowed you so richly with wisdom and truth in Christ that you yourself should be well qualified to decide this matter or even weightier problems in his Spirit and grace without our assistance.
Luther wrote to Rev. Dr. Johann Hess, a fellow Lutheran pastor at Breslau. Before giving his own opinion on the matter, Luther expresses confidence that the wisdom of God and the leading of the Holy Spirit, should have made the answer to Hess' question apparent without Luther's insights. In our current situation, facing COVID-19, one would hope that Christians could arrive at God honoring positions through applying the wisdom that they already should posses as followers of Jesus Christ. Given the wide-range of responses, however, as well as the animosity that these various positions have brought with them toward those who hold differing views, it seems that we too need Luther's wisdom to help us see things more clearly.
Those who are engaged in a spiritual ministry such as preachers and pastors must likewise remain steadfast before the peril of death. We have a plain command from Christ, “A good shepherd lays down his life for the sheep but the hireling sees the wolf coming and flees” [John 10:11]. For when people are dying, they most need a spiritual ministry which strengthens and comforts their consciences by word and sacrament and in faith overcomes death. However, where enough preachers are available in one locality and they agree to encourage the other clergy to leave in order not to expose themselves needlessly to danger, I do not consider such conduct sinful because spiritual services are provided for and because they would have been ready and willing to stay if it had been necessary. We read that St. Athanasius fled from his church that his life might be spared because many others were there to administer his office. Similarly, the brethren in Damascus lowered Paul in a basket over the wall to make it possible for him to escape, Acts 9 [:25]. And also in Acts 19 [:30] Paul allowed himself to be kept from risking danger in the marketplace because it was not essential for him to do so.
In Luther's view, the clergy were obligated to ensure that ministry continued among the people, even during times of plague. He did however, note an important caveat, only such as were needed should expose themselves to danger. This theme will be developed by Luther throughout the letter: to expose oneself unnecessarily to danger is to tempt God, and is thus immoral. This has relevance for the ongoing debate about 'reopening' churches. {update 8/21: The same principle applies regarding mask wearing and vaccinations, as those issue continue to be contested} We are blessed in this generation with the ability to worship remotely. In this way, we can both fulfill our obligation to continue to worship and teach the Word of God, and minimize the risk of spreading contagion.
Yes, no one should dare leave his neighbor unless there are others who will take care of the sick in their stead and nurse them. In such cases we must respect the word of Christ, “I was sick and you did not visit me …” [Matt. 25:41–46]. According to this passage we are bound to each other in such a way that no one may forsake the other in his distress but is obliged to assist and help him as he himself would like to be helped.
Given the lack of public medical care, one of Luther's primary concerns was that brotherly/neighborly love be maintained as a witness to Christ. Times of disaster do not put our obligations to each other on hold. {Update 8/21: This same passage is one reason why I have not kept silent in the face of anti-vax attitudes based upon non-factual (that is, lies) information. Should I turn a blind eye to those who if they continue on this path are likely to become sick, and some die?? No, for the same reason that I would caution against other choices that a Christian would make to harm his/her Temple, we are not our own, our bodies do not belong to us, Jesus paid the price for them.}
To flee from death and to save one’s life is a natural tendency, implanted by God and not forbidden unless it be against God and neighbor, as St. Paul says in Ephesians 4 [5:29], “No man ever hates his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it.” It is even commanded that every man should as much as possible preserve body and life and not neglect them, as St. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 12 [:21–26] that God has so ordered the members of the body that each one cares and works for the other...How much more appropriate it is therefore to seek to preserve life and avoid death if this can be done without harm to our neighbor, inasmuch as life is more than food and clothing, as Christ himself says in Matthew 5 [6:25]
Much has been said during this pandemic about 'living in fear', as if taking precautions is somehow against living by faith. Martin Luther disagreed, strongly. He saw fear of contagion and death as a natural, even God given, tendency. As a member of the body of Christ, we each have an obligation to protect our own health, as much as possible, "unless it be against God and neighbor". Rather than a sign of weakness, or of lack of faith, taking necessary precautions to protect own's own life is a sign of gratitude toward God (for the giving of that life in the first place).
Examples in Holy Scripture abundantly prove that to flee from death is not wrong in itself. Abraham was a great saint but he feared death and escaped it by pretending that his wife, Sarah, was his sister. Because he did so without neglecting or adversely affecting his neighbor, it was not counted as a sin against him. His son, Isaac, did likewise. Jacob also fled from his brother Esau to avoid death at his hands. Likewise, David fled from Saul, and from Absalom. The prophet Uriah escaped from King Jehoiakim and fled into Egypt. The valiant prophet, Elijah, 1 Kings 19 [:3], had destroyed all the prophets of Baal by his great faith, but afterward, when Queen Jezebel threatened him, he became afraid and fled into the desert. Before that, Moses fled into the land of Midian when the king searched for him in Egypt. Many others have done likewise. All of them fled from death when it was possible and saved their lives, yet without depriving their neighbors of anything but first meeting their obligations toward them. Yes, you may reply, but these examples do not refer to dying by pestilence but to death under persecution. Answer: Death is death, no matter how it occurs. According to Holy Scripture God sent his four scourges: pestilence, famine, sword, and wild beasts. If it is permissible to flee from one or the other in clear conscience, why not from all four? Our examples demonstrate how the holy fathers escaped from the sword; it is quite evident that Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob fled from the other scourge, namely, hunger and death, when they went to Egypt to escape famine, as we are told in Genesis [40–47]
Here Luther cites numerous examples from the Heroes of the Faith, that even men such as Abraham and David fled from danger. In Luther's mind, to wisely flee from the threat of violence is not different than protecting oneself against wild animals, famine, or in this case, pestilence. {Update 8/21: This line is so important, "Death is death, no matter how it occurs", Luther saw it as a Christian duty to avoid unnecessary risk, not a matter of personal choice or freedom at all}
By such reasoning, when a house is on fire, no one should run outside or rush to help because such a fire is also a punishment from God. Anyone who falls into deep water dare not save himself by swimming but must surrender to the water as to a divine punishment. Very well, do so if you can but do not tempt God
Here Luther counters the folly of fatalism from those who proclaim any misfortune to be God's punishment. When taken to its logical extreme, such people should not seek food or shelter either, trusting in God's providence. Today's version of this outlook is on display from those who ignore social distancing while yelling, "I'm covered by the blood of Jesus". To ignore the wisdom which God has given us, through modern medicine, as some sort of way of publicly proclaiming one's faith, is both an act of pride, and an attempt to tempt God into protecting us from our own folly. {Update 8/21: Likewise, those who proclaim that faith is the best defense, making a vaccination unnecessary are tempting God, to do so is BAD theology}.
We should then need no apothecaries or drugs or physicians because all illnesses are punishment from God. Hunger and thirst are also great punishments and torture. Why do you eat and drink instead of letting yourself be punished until hunger and thirst stop of themselves? Ultimately such talk will lead to the point where we abbreviate the Lord’s Prayer and no longer pray, “deliver us from evil, Amen,” since we would have to stop praying to be saved from hell and stop seeking to escape it. It, too, is God’s punishment as is every kind of evil. Where would all this end? From what has been said we derive this guidance: We must pray against every form of evil and guard against it to the best of our ability in order not to act contrary to God, as was previously explained. If it be God’s will that evil come upon us and destroy us, none of our precautions will help us.
The proper outcome of faith is not fatalism, but realism. If medicine exists, use it. If precautions can be taken, follow them. If, after having done this, it is still the will of God that we should become ill, and having done so, that we should die, so be it. The people of God were told to pray for deliverance for a reason. Luther was clear about whether or not we need to do our part to protect ourselves against the evil of the plague, "guard against it to the best of our ability". The important questions for much America's Christians: Why are small precautions, that cost us comparatively little, the cause of such anger and defiance?
In the same way we must and we owe it to our neighbor to accord him the same treatment in other troubles and perils, also. If his house is on fire, love compels me to run to help him extinguish the flames... A man who will not help or support others unless he can do so without affecting his safety or his property will never help his neighbor. He will always reckon with the possibility that doing so will bring some disadvantage and damage, danger and loss.
Once again, our obligation to our neighbor is no different when facing an invisible contagion than when facing visible flames. It will always cost us something to help our neighbor, and there will always be excuses to hand for those who want to find them. {Update 8/21: Love compels me to urge my family, friends, and neighbors to be vaccinated, Love compels me to 'run to help'. Don't tell me to ignore the Law of Love when God has commanded me to follow it!}
It would be well, where there is such an efficient government in cities and states, to maintain municipal homes and hospitals staffed with people to take care of the sick so that patients from private homes can be sent there — as was the intent and purpose of our forefathers with so many pious bequests, hospices, hospitals, and infirmaries so that it should not be necessary for every citizen to maintain a hospital in his own home. That would indeed be a fine, commendable, and Christian arrangement to which everyone should offer generous help and contributions, particularly the government. Where there are no such institutions — and they exist in only a few places — we must give hospital care and be nurses for one another in any extremity or risk the loss of salvation and the grace of God. Thus it is written in God’s word and command, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” and in Matthew 7 [:12], “So whatever you wish that men would do to you, do so to them.”
Public healthcare was almost nonexistent in Luther's day. We are so very much more blessed in that regard. Our response today? Continue to support those institutions, the workers who risk their lives there, and the politicians who ensure that they have the resources they need to help the sick. {Update 8/21: Having prayed with nurses and staff in our local hospital during the height here locally of the pandemic, this sentiment is only strengthened in me; they were (are) doing the Lord's work and require our support. Additionally, note that Luther was in favor of government's involvement in healthcare, he wanted them to help the people.}
Because we know that it is the devil’s game to induce such fear and dread, we should in turn minimize it, take such courage as to spite and annoy him, and send those terrors right back to him. And we should arm ourselves with this answer to the devil: “Get away, you devil, with your terrors! Just because you hate it, I’ll spite you by going the more quickly to help my sick neighbor
This is the balance that Luther is calling for: One the one hand, take necessary precautions to protect our own lives and not spread contagion, on the other, do what needs to be done to help those in need. Thanks to our much greater understanding about how disease is spread, we have the opportunity to do both of these things without compromise. We can make sure that our neighbors are not neglected during times of crisis like this pandemic without recklessly endangering them or us.
This I well know, that if it were Christ or his mother who were laid low by illness, everybody would be so solicitous and would gladly become a servant or helper. Everyone would want to be bold and fearless; nobody would flee but everyone would come running. And yet they don’t hear what Christ himself says, “As you did to one of the least, you did it to me” [Matt. 25:40].
Who is my neighbor? Luther imagines the throng of people willing to volunteer if Jesus or Mary were ill, but then reminds us that each of 'the least' among us should be treated the same way. By the way, Luther goes on to point out the folly of thinking you'd be willing to help Jesus if you aren't willing to help others in the here and now.
Others sin on the right hand. They are much too rash and reckless, tempting God and disregarding everything which might counteract death and the plague. They disdain the use of medicines; they do not avoid places and persons infected by the plague, but lightheartedly make sport of it and wish to prove how independent they are. They say that it is God’s punishment; if he wants to protect them he can do so without medicines or our carefulness. This is not trusting God but tempting him. God has created medicines and provided us with intelligence to guard and take good care of the body so that we can live in good health.
If one makes no use of intelligence or medicine when he could do so without detriment to his neighbor, such a person injures his body and must beware lest he become a suicide in God’s eyes. By the same reasoning a person might forego eating and drinking, clothing and shelter, and boldly proclaim his faith that if God wanted to preserve him from starvation and cold, he could do so without food and clothing. Actually that would be suicide. It is even more shameful for a person to pay no heed to his own body and to fail to protect it against the plague the best he is able, and then to infect and poison others who might have remained alive if he had taken care of his body as he should have. He is thus responsible before God for his neighbor’s death and is a murderer many times over. Indeed, such people behave as though a house were burning in the city and nobody were trying to put the fire out. Instead they give leeway to the flames so that the whole city is consumed, saying that if God so willed, he could save the city without water to quench the fire.
No, my dear friends, that is no good. Use medicine; take potions which can help you; fumigate house, yard, and street; shun persons and places wherever your neighbor does not need your presence or has recovered, and act like a man who wants to help put out the burning city. What else is the epidemic but a fire which instead of consuming wood and straw devours life and body? You ought to think this way: “Very well, by God’s decree the enemy has sent us poison and deadly offal. Therefore I shall ask God mercifully to protect us. Then I shall fumigate, help purify the air, administer medicine, and take it. I shall avoid places and persons where my presence is not needed in order not to become contaminated and thus perchance infect and pollute others, and so cause their death as a result of my negligence. If God should wish to take me, he will surely find me and I have done what he has expected of me and so I am not responsible for either my own death or the death of others. If my neighbor needs me, however, I shall not avoid place or person but will go freely, as stated above. See, this is such a God-fearing faith because it is neither brash nor foolhardy and does not tempt God.
A long section, but the heart of the matter as Christians today argue about how we should respond to things like government mask-wearing mandates. Notice that Luther compares the cavalier attitudes of those who take no precautions to that of a suicide. He also considers those who knowingly spread the contagion to be murderers. Even conceding that the Plague was 30x more deadly than COVID-19, Luther's moral premise remains. In this pandemic many more people will 'get away with' it because the results of our actions will not be readily apparent. The best phrase in the section, "act like a man who wants to help put out the burning city." That is the true test, do our actions help or hurt the spread of the pandemic? Are we helping our neighbors in need, or ignoring them?
" I shall avoid places and persons where my presence is not needed in order not to become contaminated and thus perchance infect and pollute others, and so cause their death as a result of my negligence." Is your presence necessary? 500 years ago Martin Luther was considering the dictates of social distancing.
Perhaps it was foolish for Martin Luther to remain in Wittenberg, especially with a pregnant wife and young child to care for. Had there been ample public health facilities, and other ministers who could have taken his place, he may have followed his own advice and declared his presence there to be not 'necessary'. The point of examining Luther's words from five centuries ago during a far more deadly outbreak is simple: If the Christians of medieval Europe could find ways to care for their neighbors AND take the threat of contagion seriously, why can't we?
Tuesday, May 26, 2020
Sermon Video: The defeat of Death by Jesus - 1 Corinthians 15:54-57
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sunday, April 5, 2020
Sermon Video: Christ will reign - 1 Corinthians 15:23-28
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sunday, March 29, 2020
Sermon Video: In Christ all will be made alive - 1 Corinthians 15:20-22
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Wednesday, May 2, 2018
The moral question of Avengers: Infinity War (Spoiler Free)
There is a central moral question at work in Avengers: Infinity War between the protagonist, the villain Thanos, and the multitude of antagonists, the Avengers, Guardians, and various other Marvel heroes. The goal of Thanos (no spoiler here as the trailers explained it months ago) is to wipe out half of the life in the universe in order to "balance" life and usher in an age of abundance and peace. At the root of the motivation of Thanos is the fear of overpopulation (and with it environmental degradation) leading to suffering and strife over limited resources. In other words, in order to significantly decrease suffering and increase happiness, countless sentient lives have to be snuffed out. Thanos believes that the ends justify the means (his goal is worth killing over), conversely the various heroes reject this moral equivalence, maintaining the sanctity of all life.
Tuesday, April 3, 2018
Sermon Video: "He is not here, he is risen" Matthew 28:1-10
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Tuesday, April 18, 2017
Sermon Video: The Rise of the Son - Mark 16:1-8
Tuesday, March 29, 2016
Sermon Video: The living hope of the resurrection - I Peter 1:3-5
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
Sermon Video - "Who will get what you have prepared for yourself?" Luke 12:13-21
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Sermon Video: "resting on the hope of eternal life" - Titus 1:1-4
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Monday, May 13, 2013
Sermon Video: "to live is Christ, to die is gain" - Philippians 1:19-26
In the end, Paul was willing to continue striving for the sake of Gospel, if it is God's will. Likewise, Paul was willing to meet his Creator and lay down his burden.
A life lived by faith in Christ, yet cut short for whatever reason, is worth living.
A life lived in vain self-service, no matter how long, is in the end meaningless.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Sunday, March 17, 2013
Sermon Video: "unless a kernel of wheat falls" - John 12:24-32
The same principle which Jesus proves in his own life applies to our lives as well. If we believe that our lives are our own, and hold them tightly in our grasp, we will in the end lose that life just the same to no purpose. If, however, we believe that our life is a gift of God, a stewardship for which we must one day give account, we will throughout our lives give of ourselves to show the love of God to others and in the end be rewarded by God for our faithfulness.
It may be a paradox, but the Son of Man will destroy sin and death by taking the world's sin upon his back and dying. The moment of supreme victory for Lucifer's campaign of rebellion against Heaven will instead be the moment of complete defeat as Jesus rises from the grave in victory once-for-all ending the enslavement of mankind to sin and reconciling the world to God. The cross, a symbol of brutal Roman oppression will in time become the symbol of hope for lost, the poor, and the hopeless. In death, Jesus will provide life; in death, victory.
The question then becomes: Will we follow suit? Will we walk in the footsteps of Jesus, give our lives freely to a life of service?
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video