The portions below in italics are from the article by Antonio Spadaro, SJ - Marcelo Figueroa, published on July 18th, 2018 in the Vatican approved journal: La Civilta Cattolica To read the full article, click on the following link: The Prosperity Gospel: Dangerous and Different
To view my previous blog post related to the Prosperity Gospel, or both of the sermons from Malachi that relate to this topic, click on the following link: What I've written/said previously about the Prosperity Gospel.
As the Prosperity Gospel grows in its influence and numbers, it become more and more necessary for those who preach the Gospel as given to us by the Word of God to refute this man-centered perversion that replaces our call to be servants with a promise of material blessings.
The “prosperity
gospel” is a well-known theological current emerging from the neo-Pentecostal
evangelical movements. At its heart is the belief that God wants his followers
to have a prosperous life, that is, to be rich, healthy and happy. This type of
Christianity places the well-being of the believer at the center of prayer, and
turns God the Creator into someone who makes the thoughts and desires of
believers come true.
The lifeblood of everything positive and valid that has come out of Martin Luther's call for Reformation has been the reliance upon the "five solas" {Sola scriptura ("by Scripture alone"), Sola fide ("by faith alone"), Sola gratia ("by grace alone"), Solus Christus or Solo Christo ("Christ alone" or "through Christ alone"), Soli Deo gloria ("glory to God alone")} The rise of the Prosperity Gospel challenges, if not outright rejects, four of them when it takes scripture out of its original context and historic meaning in order to give it a individualistic/materialistic spin, devalues faith and grace by making people responsible for their own well being, and downplays the glory that belongs to God by moving the focus of the Gospel from God's amazing love and grace to our own wants.
What is absolutely
clear is that the economic, media and political power of these groups – which
we generically call “evangelicals of the American Dream” – makes them more
visible than the other evangelical churches, even those of the classical
Pentecostal variety. In addition, their growth is exponential and directly
proportional to the economic, physical and spiritual benefits they promise
their followers: all these blessings are far removed from the life of
conversion usually taught by the traditional evangelical movements.
The Scripture passages that have been warped by advocates of the Prosperity Gospel are too numerous to briefly interact with, but common threads involve viewing the promises of the Abrahamic Covenant as belonging to the Church, downplaying the cost of discipleship and emphasizing the blessings for those who follow Christ, particularly the material ones here and now.
The pillars of the prosperity gospel, as we have mentioned, are
essentially two: economic well-being and health. This accentuation is the fruit
of a literalist exegesis of some biblical texts that are taken within a
reductionist hermeneutic. The Holy Spirit is limited to a power placed at the
service of individual well-being. Jesus Christ has abandoned his role as Lord
and transformed into being a debtor to each one of his words. The Father is
reduced to being “a sort of cosmic bellhop that responds to the needs and
desires of his creatures.”"Name it and claim it", what a warped reality. Where is it written in the Scriptures that God is intent upon fulfilling our will? Are we not called to serve the kingdom of God? Are we not called to sacrifice of ourselves for others?
A refrain that many of these pastors use is “There is a miracle in your mouth.” The miraculous process is the following: visualize in detail what you want, declare it expressly with your mouth, claim it with the faith and authority of God and consider it already received. Effectively, “claiming” the promises of God, which have been extracted from the biblical texts or the prophetic word of the pastor, places the believer in a dominant position with respect to a God who is imprisoned by his own word, as perceived and believed by the faithful.
When you turn prosperity into a test of faith, you automatically devalue morality (who cares what sins you commit, if you're rich God must be blessing you) and mortally wound compassion. What will the affect upon the Church be of such a movement? Disaster, pure and simple. Without a servant's heart, the Church is doomed, without compassion for others, the Church is doomed. The Gospel cannot survive without them.
There can be no compassion for those who are not prosperous, for clearly they have not followed the rules and thus live in failure and are not loved by God.
Generally, the fact
that there are riches and material benefits fall once again on the exclusive
responsibility of the believer, and consequently so too their poverty or lack
of goods. Material victory places the believer in a position of pride due to
the power of their “faith.” On the contrary, poverty hits them with a blow that
is unbearable for two reasons: first, the person thinks their faith is unable
to move the providential hands of God; second, their miserable situation is a
divine imposition, a relentless punishment to be accepted in submission.
The quote in the final paragraph from the article is from Pope Francis. Whether you like him or not, whether you agree with him or not, whether you consider the Catholic Church to be a partner or a rival regarding the Gospel, those who adhere to the tenants of the Reformation ought to be encouraged to have an ally denouncing "justification by their own efforts" on the part of those who preach and follow the Prosperity Gospel. The Gospel is not about me, its about God. The Church doesn't exist to serve me, it exists to guide people to God (by grace through faith) and increase the worship of God by those he created. When man is at the center, the Gospel fails.
As he wrote in his apostolic exhortation Gaudete et Exsultate,
there are Christians who are committed to following the path of “justification
by their own efforts, the worship of the human will and their own abilities.
The result is a self-centered and elitist complacency, bereft of true love.
This finds expression in a variety of apparently unconnected ways of thinking
and acting,” among them “an excessive concern with programs of self-help and
personal fulfillment” (No. 57).
No comments:
Post a Comment