One of the things that
most people don’t realize is just how much the underlying assumptions in their
thought processes affect the way that they look at the world around them. From this point I could illustrate what I
mean using any number of fields, from politics, to philosophy, from current
events to pop culture. The area that I’m
going to focus upon is the affect that a pre-millennial and pre-tribulation
interpretation of the portions of Scripture that refer to the End Times can
have upon Christians who subscribe to them.
A term that encapsulates these beliefs and others related to the relationship
between Israel and the Church, Dispensationalism, likewise carries with it
implications for how those who hold to it look at the world around them and how
they interpret Scripture.
This is not intended as a critique of Dispensationalism,
although the notion often associated with it that the Church (or even America)
has replaced Israel in God’s Covenant deserves to be critiqued, rather I am
simply pointing out the affect that such a viewpoint can have upon one’s
outlook even without the person who thinks these things being aware of where
those notions originate. Nor is this a
refutation of pre-millennial or pre-tribulation interpretations of the End
Times, I myself hold to both of them, though certainly not with dogmatic fervor
due to the very strong warnings in Scripture that the End Times will come like
a “thief”. I have always maintained that
anyone who claims to know anything about when the Second Coming of Jesus is
going to happen is either trying to sell something or woefully misinformed
about Scripture.
So, what is this viewpoint altering phenomenon that
happens to those who hold to pre-millennial, pre-tribulation, and/or
Dispensational beliefs? Pessimism, pure
and simple. Anyone who believes that
human history MUST greatly decline BEFORE the return of Jesus Christ while not
be surprised by news of tragedy in our world, will not have much hope for the
future, and may even welcome news of woe as a sign that the end is nigh. I have witnessed this twisted welcoming of
tragedy, be it wars, pestilence, natural disasters, or the Church supposedly
slipping toward Apostasy, on the part of people whose belief that the future
can only be a downward curve precisely because they are convinced that
Scripture predicts just such a trajectory to history.
Forget for a moment that history moves in vast swings,
from good to bad, from prosperity to want, and from liberalism to conservatism,
such that storms could be on the horizon now, and yet sunshine could be just
around the corner. I say that because
Christians continue to convince themselves that Jesus Christ will return in
their own lifetimes, despite the warnings from Scripture, because we can’t help
but think of our own generation as the pivotal one in history. Even if the next hundred years are a
mitigated disaster, as anyone looking at 1914-1945 would have to conclude, who
is to say that the decades to follow wouldn’t be one of peace and progress?
The point that I’m hoping you will see is that those who
look to the future and see only woe before Christ will return can’t help
themselves when they read the news, they see signs of decline, skip signs of
good things, and confirm their own assumption that the future must be
bleak. Of course this attitude has vast
implications as those who don’t believe that the future holds any hope won’t be
very keen to invest themselves in project or efforts designed to alleviate
things such as world hunger or disease and are likely to care little about the
environment, just to name a few.
In regards to the Church itself, a similar pattern of
pessimism unfolds. Those who believe
that the Church MUST be in a state of Apostasy BEFORE Christ can return are
forever looking for signs that the Church is failing in its mission. How can this not have a negative effect upon
missions, church unity, and ecumenism?
There are far too many Christians who believe that they can write off
all of the Orthodox, Catholic, mainline Protestant, and plenty of other people
who call themselves Christians, who have put their faith in Jesus Christ, and
who seek to be his disciples, simply because a worldwide Church that is
succeeding and triumphing doesn’t fit their own viewpoint. In essence, they look at 95% of all of the
people who have called upon the name of the Lord, as Paul says in Romans 10:13,
and conclude that the grace of God is incapable of saving them because only a
tiny minority of the universal Church is not in a state of Apostasy. Needless to say, I cannot understand how the
Church of God, empowered by the Holy Spirit, can be thought of as being so
impotent.
If pre-millennialism and pre-tribulation beliefs, along
with Dispensationalism, tend to lead to these fatalistic and pessimistic
viewpoints, what can we do about it? Do
we have to adopt a post-millennial belief in order to be optimistic and
therefore anticipate the triumph of the Church BEFORE Jesus can return? We don’t have to do that, unbridled optimism
has similar pitfalls (such as not thinking anything needs to be done because
the future of necessity must get better), although without the doom and gloom
mood. Being aware that such attitudes
are a danger is the beginning of keeping yourself from falling prey to
them. I have no idea if the next 100
years are going to be a golden age or a wasteland for America, the Church, or
the world; but neither do the pre-millennial OR the post-millennial advocates. What we think the future holds, affects how
we view today; since only the Father truly knows the future, why don’t we stop
acting like we have inside information.
No comments:
Post a Comment