What is the proper role of a pastor? What duties, responsibilities, and obligations should be carried out by the person(s) entrusted to lead God's Church? The Early Church ran into this dilemma in its own way when some of the widows were being overlooked in the daily distribution of food. The disciples, keenly aware of their calling to witness and make disciples, declined to become personally involved in this aspect of the Church's ministry. Instead, they had the church choose seven men with reputations for wisdom and spiritually maturity from among themselves. The disciples then turned this ministry over to them and continued to concentrate upon prayer and the ministry of the Word.
The episode in the life of the Early Church beautifully illustrates the need for lay leadership in the church and the obvious truth that no pastor(s) can, or should, do everything. The reasons why churches fail to share the burden of ministry vary, from ego to timidity to laziness, but the end result if the same: burnt out ministers and churches more dead than alive. When God's people answer the call of service, there is no limit to what God can do in their midst.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
This blog serves as an outreach for Pastor Randy Powell of the First Baptist Church of Franklin, PA. Feel free to ask questions or send me an e-mail at pastorpowell@hotmail.com
Friday, September 13, 2013
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
The privelage and peril of preaching
Those of you who have listened to my sermons know I'm not one for alliteration (starting each point with the same letter), but that title just slipped out. Preaching is certainly a privilege, being able to stand before God's people and proclaim what his Word is telling them is a rare honor. At the same time, preaching is a path full of potential perils (yikes, 4 more "p" words, I can't stop it now!) There are numerous errors that a preacher can make, lots of mistakes that can creep in, some mostly harmless and some downright frightening. I recently re-read one of my college texts, D.A. Carson's Exegetical Fallacies. Carson's book explains a whole host of fallacies (errors) that can be made when interpreting Scripture, among them: word-study, grammatical, logical, presuppositional and historical. The book is excellent, full of helpful reminders, but certainly a challenge to anyone not familiar with English grammar (as a former English teacher, I would say that would be 90% of Americans or more) and those who don't have a minimal knowledge of Greek and Hebrew.
So, what is the person in the pew to do, how can they know that their minister is "rightly diving the word of truth"? (II Timothy 2:15, the AWANA key verse) At the heart of Carson's warnings is the notion that we need to let the Bible speak to us instead of seeking to find in the Bible that which we already think. One of the best ways for a preacher to keep the Word speaking through him instead of the other way around is to honor and respect the context of Scripture. Each and every message brought by a preacher of God's Word needs to be faithful to the text it was taken from, and it needs to be faithful to the message of the Bible as a whole. We have all seen the damage that can be done when politicians take the words of their opponent out of context, far be it from us to do the same damage with God's Word by not properly representing what the original intent of the Scripture was to it's first audience. When we understand what God's Word meant then (or at least have a reasonable inference about what it meant), we can begin to understand what God's Word means for us now.
To help keep myself from error is one of the reasons why I choose to preach through passages of Scripture rather than topically. If I wanted to preach a message about poverty (for example), I would have huge chunks of the Bible to choose from, but isn't the act of choosing itself going to influence my eventual conclusions, won't I be tempted to ignore the passages or verses that aren't on point in favor of ones that seem to be (especially out of context)? Instead, if I let the Scripture speak by working my way through the entire Sermon on the Mount (for example), I will have to explain everything that Jesus said and not just the things that fit the message I wanted to bring. Along those same lines, I don't typically write my sermon introduction until I'm finished with the message for the simple reason that I usually don't know exactly what I'm going to be saying about the next passage of Scripture until I actually write it.
I know that a lot of preachers out there always preach topically, citing verse after verse to support their point that are often scattered throughout Scripture; it isn't for me. The next time you listen to that type of message, jot down each of the references, look up the passages, and see if the verses were used properly based upon their context or not. There are plenty of Exegetical Fallacies that a preacher can make, that's one I'd rather avoid.
So, what is the person in the pew to do, how can they know that their minister is "rightly diving the word of truth"? (II Timothy 2:15, the AWANA key verse) At the heart of Carson's warnings is the notion that we need to let the Bible speak to us instead of seeking to find in the Bible that which we already think. One of the best ways for a preacher to keep the Word speaking through him instead of the other way around is to honor and respect the context of Scripture. Each and every message brought by a preacher of God's Word needs to be faithful to the text it was taken from, and it needs to be faithful to the message of the Bible as a whole. We have all seen the damage that can be done when politicians take the words of their opponent out of context, far be it from us to do the same damage with God's Word by not properly representing what the original intent of the Scripture was to it's first audience. When we understand what God's Word meant then (or at least have a reasonable inference about what it meant), we can begin to understand what God's Word means for us now.
To help keep myself from error is one of the reasons why I choose to preach through passages of Scripture rather than topically. If I wanted to preach a message about poverty (for example), I would have huge chunks of the Bible to choose from, but isn't the act of choosing itself going to influence my eventual conclusions, won't I be tempted to ignore the passages or verses that aren't on point in favor of ones that seem to be (especially out of context)? Instead, if I let the Scripture speak by working my way through the entire Sermon on the Mount (for example), I will have to explain everything that Jesus said and not just the things that fit the message I wanted to bring. Along those same lines, I don't typically write my sermon introduction until I'm finished with the message for the simple reason that I usually don't know exactly what I'm going to be saying about the next passage of Scripture until I actually write it.
I know that a lot of preachers out there always preach topically, citing verse after verse to support their point that are often scattered throughout Scripture; it isn't for me. The next time you listen to that type of message, jot down each of the references, look up the passages, and see if the verses were used properly based upon their context or not. There are plenty of Exegetical Fallacies that a preacher can make, that's one I'd rather avoid.
Friday, August 23, 2013
Sermon Video "I can do everything" Philippians 4:10-19
"I can do everything", it seems like such an awesome promise from God in Philippians 4:13, the kind of thing I could grab hold of for just about anything in life; it seems to imply also that "there isn't anything I can't do". As anyone who has lived for a while as a Christian knows, there are plenty of things we can't do. So, what do the words of Paul here mean, and why isn't this the all encompassing promise that it seems to be at first glance?
The passage of Philippians, from verses 10-19 of chapter 4, are a great example of the need to interpret Scripture contextually, that is, within its proper context. It may be that taking a phrase or verse all by itself will be harmless, but such a cookie cutter approach to Scripture has great potential for harm. As such, we must also strive to see the whole thought of the author, whether that is one sentence, one paragraph, or even a chapter or more of Scripture. When we put Scripture within its proper context, looking at what proceeds it and what follows it, we allow the Word of God to speak to us. There is always a danger that we will look to Scripture for what we want to hear, with blinders on to all else, allowing Scripture to speak to us is a safeguard against that error.
In the case of Philippians 4:13, Paul is talking about his ability to continue the ministry of the Gospel whether his needs are met or not. Paul had to endure times of scarcity, as well as times of plenty, while doing the work of the Lord, but through it all he learned the secret of contentment: God's power. The "everything" in question, when seen in context, is a reference to Paul's ability to be content, to continue God's work, even when times are tough. God's power thus is utilized by Paul to do God's work, and Paul was firmly convinced through his own experience that such power would never run dry.
The next time you see a Biblical quote out of context, take the time to read the entire passage, and then you will know whether or not the person utilizing that piece of Scripture is doing so as it was intended. As Christians, God's Word is our guide, our direction in this life, we owe it to ourselves and to God to listen to all of it.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
The passage of Philippians, from verses 10-19 of chapter 4, are a great example of the need to interpret Scripture contextually, that is, within its proper context. It may be that taking a phrase or verse all by itself will be harmless, but such a cookie cutter approach to Scripture has great potential for harm. As such, we must also strive to see the whole thought of the author, whether that is one sentence, one paragraph, or even a chapter or more of Scripture. When we put Scripture within its proper context, looking at what proceeds it and what follows it, we allow the Word of God to speak to us. There is always a danger that we will look to Scripture for what we want to hear, with blinders on to all else, allowing Scripture to speak to us is a safeguard against that error.
In the case of Philippians 4:13, Paul is talking about his ability to continue the ministry of the Gospel whether his needs are met or not. Paul had to endure times of scarcity, as well as times of plenty, while doing the work of the Lord, but through it all he learned the secret of contentment: God's power. The "everything" in question, when seen in context, is a reference to Paul's ability to be content, to continue God's work, even when times are tough. God's power thus is utilized by Paul to do God's work, and Paul was firmly convinced through his own experience that such power would never run dry.
The next time you see a Biblical quote out of context, take the time to read the entire passage, and then you will know whether or not the person utilizing that piece of Scripture is doing so as it was intended. As Christians, God's Word is our guide, our direction in this life, we owe it to ourselves and to God to listen to all of it.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Sermon Video: "think about such things" Philippians 4:8-9
What do we think about each day? Can we shape our thoughts in order to think about better things?
After explaining that anxiety can be eased through bringing our concerns to God, Paul continues by saying that our thoughts should focus upon things which are, true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent, and praiseworthy. But how do we do that, how do we avoid negative thoughts and embrace positive ones? Throughout the Bible, right thinking goes hand in glove with right actions. If we, as Christians, are going to focus upon the things of God, things like those in Paul's list, we're going to have to do so through our actions. The more we do things which can be described as true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent, and praiseworthy, the more our minds will be shaped by those actions. Along those same lines, the more we fill our daily lives with godly things, the less room we will have for negative thoughts as well as temptations toward sinful actions. As always, this is a group effort of the whole of the Church to be Christ-like, are efforts can and should be together. This isn't a promise of a life free of anxiety or troubles, the Bible never promises that, but it is the path toward greater Christ-likeness, and that will guarantee, as Paul says, that "the God of peace will be with you."
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
After explaining that anxiety can be eased through bringing our concerns to God, Paul continues by saying that our thoughts should focus upon things which are, true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent, and praiseworthy. But how do we do that, how do we avoid negative thoughts and embrace positive ones? Throughout the Bible, right thinking goes hand in glove with right actions. If we, as Christians, are going to focus upon the things of God, things like those in Paul's list, we're going to have to do so through our actions. The more we do things which can be described as true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent, and praiseworthy, the more our minds will be shaped by those actions. Along those same lines, the more we fill our daily lives with godly things, the less room we will have for negative thoughts as well as temptations toward sinful actions. As always, this is a group effort of the whole of the Church to be Christ-like, are efforts can and should be together. This isn't a promise of a life free of anxiety or troubles, the Bible never promises that, but it is the path toward greater Christ-likeness, and that will guarantee, as Paul says, that "the God of peace will be with you."
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
Speaking My Mind by Tony Campolo
This past spring our regional baptist association invited Tony Campolo to speak at our annual gathering. The suggested topic for Tony was the problem of complacency among Christians (in other words, what do we do to get people on fire for serving God?). Prior to going to the event, I received a letter written by one of the pastors of our association and signed by all of his board members that condemned the invitation of Tony and warned us that his teachings were dangerous. The letter included snippets of quotes from a variety of Professor Campolo's books, many of which seemed to be out of context. As a former English teacher, seeing quotes taken out of context sends up a huge red flag to me. I went to the meeting, having heard good things about Tony's presentations from my friends, Pastor Jeff Little (First UMC) and Mother Holly (St. John's Episcopal).
What type of message would we hear? Would the Gospel be clear or lost in the social efforts that Tony's critics accuse him of replacing it with?
It is amazing what you can learn when you give someone the chance to share what is on their heart. Throughout his presentation, Tony Campolo gave a heart stirring call to the Church to truly be the servants of Jesus Christ that we have been called to be. The Evangelical nature of his message was beyond doubt, there at the heart of everything he was preaching was the need for each man, woman, and child to find a relationship with God, through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and to turn that relationship into a life-altering experience of righteous living. What more could any believer in the fundamentals of the faith want?
The hype, fodder for television commentators and blog posts, was entirely overblown. The venom directed at Tony from his critics was a farce. If this man's commitment to the Gospel of Jesus Christ is not genuine, then nobody who publicly declares their faith in Christ can be trusted. If this man's passion for the Lost is not acceptable to you, then your problem is with the call of Jesus to champion the poor.
Which brings me to his book, Speaking My Mind, which I finished reading today. I won't claim that everything in the book made me happy, nor am I in agreement with all of it, I will however confirm that the passion for the Gospel I found while listening to Tony last spring is part and parcel of his written works as well. Are there things in the book that will cause some Christians to write Tony off as a liberal? Yes. Are there things in the book that those same Christians need to hear because they echo the words of the Gospel? Yes. Do yourself a favor, read the book, think about it, weigh what it says by the scale of Scripture, and then decide what God would have you do about poverty, nationalism, homosexuality, environmentalism, politics, etc.
If you close your mind, you won't be listening to God either. If you truly are committed to being a disciple of Jesus Christ, don't you owe it to God to admit when you are in error? Speaking My Mind may not have all the answers, but at least Tony Campolo was brave enough to ask the questions.
What type of message would we hear? Would the Gospel be clear or lost in the social efforts that Tony's critics accuse him of replacing it with?
It is amazing what you can learn when you give someone the chance to share what is on their heart. Throughout his presentation, Tony Campolo gave a heart stirring call to the Church to truly be the servants of Jesus Christ that we have been called to be. The Evangelical nature of his message was beyond doubt, there at the heart of everything he was preaching was the need for each man, woman, and child to find a relationship with God, through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, and to turn that relationship into a life-altering experience of righteous living. What more could any believer in the fundamentals of the faith want?
The hype, fodder for television commentators and blog posts, was entirely overblown. The venom directed at Tony from his critics was a farce. If this man's commitment to the Gospel of Jesus Christ is not genuine, then nobody who publicly declares their faith in Christ can be trusted. If this man's passion for the Lost is not acceptable to you, then your problem is with the call of Jesus to champion the poor.
Which brings me to his book, Speaking My Mind, which I finished reading today. I won't claim that everything in the book made me happy, nor am I in agreement with all of it, I will however confirm that the passion for the Gospel I found while listening to Tony last spring is part and parcel of his written works as well. Are there things in the book that will cause some Christians to write Tony off as a liberal? Yes. Are there things in the book that those same Christians need to hear because they echo the words of the Gospel? Yes. Do yourself a favor, read the book, think about it, weigh what it says by the scale of Scripture, and then decide what God would have you do about poverty, nationalism, homosexuality, environmentalism, politics, etc.
If you close your mind, you won't be listening to God either. If you truly are committed to being a disciple of Jesus Christ, don't you owe it to God to admit when you are in error? Speaking My Mind may not have all the answers, but at least Tony Campolo was brave enough to ask the questions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)