What is the nature of temptation? Do believers fail because of external forces or internal faults? Ananias and Sapphira both died because of there willingness to fake a charitable heart and thus lie to the Holy Spirit. The additional tragedy of this situation is that they chose to enter into a temptation involving pride and greed when there were ample ways to avoid the situation. It was a choice. A choice to pick the "reward" of sin over the Truth of God; a bargain, but a fool's bargain.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
The Post-Christian West?
It has been popular in recent years to proclaim the end of the Christian era in the West and to speak of post-modernity as the "post-Christian era". The assessment is that the saturation of our culture by Christian ideas and values is coming to and end. There will be far more people in the future who have no real knowledge of Christianity so that when we encounter them (either as visitors to Church or in Outreach, or simply as neighbors or co-workers) we will have to work harder to establish basic Truths and prepare the ground for the Gospel to be heard.
The evidence in Europe of the "death" of Christianity is indeed stark; near empty Churches seem to be the norm, far more than vibrant ones. But is this the case in America too? We have witnessed dramatic growth in those who self-label themselves as Agnostics or Atheists, but have we also not witnessed a resurgence of those who have clung to the Church through its difficult days. Yes, Church membership is down (almost across the board), but wasn't it bloated before with those for whom it was simply a status symbol and not really a serious commitment?
The future of the Church in America lies in the hands of the generations that will inherit the leadership and responsibility from the Baby Boomers (and this soon). It will be up to us to raise high the banners that were handed down to us and proclaim our faith proudly despite the laughter of the sceptics. It will be up to us to show that relationships still have value in a fragmented culture, and that love can transcend text messages.
Christianity has taken a severe blow as a cultural force in America over the last few decades, but it remains to be seen if the Church will once again rise to the occasion through acts of humility and charity.
Despair over the future of the Church is nothing new. In generations past the Lord sent revival throughout our nation, a Great Awakening ensued; later on, a Second Great Awakening followed.
Lord, it is time, send your Third Great Awakening to a dry and thirsty land; it is not the culture of this great Nation for whom we fear, but the lost souls yearning to find hope and peace.
The evidence in Europe of the "death" of Christianity is indeed stark; near empty Churches seem to be the norm, far more than vibrant ones. But is this the case in America too? We have witnessed dramatic growth in those who self-label themselves as Agnostics or Atheists, but have we also not witnessed a resurgence of those who have clung to the Church through its difficult days. Yes, Church membership is down (almost across the board), but wasn't it bloated before with those for whom it was simply a status symbol and not really a serious commitment?
The future of the Church in America lies in the hands of the generations that will inherit the leadership and responsibility from the Baby Boomers (and this soon). It will be up to us to raise high the banners that were handed down to us and proclaim our faith proudly despite the laughter of the sceptics. It will be up to us to show that relationships still have value in a fragmented culture, and that love can transcend text messages.
Christianity has taken a severe blow as a cultural force in America over the last few decades, but it remains to be seen if the Church will once again rise to the occasion through acts of humility and charity.
Despair over the future of the Church is nothing new. In generations past the Lord sent revival throughout our nation, a Great Awakening ensued; later on, a Second Great Awakening followed.
Lord, it is time, send your Third Great Awakening to a dry and thirsty land; it is not the culture of this great Nation for whom we fear, but the lost souls yearning to find hope and peace.
Can we change ourselves?
I'm reading Will Mancini's Church Unique right now and a quote he utilized when talking about Church Growth from Gordon MacDonald caught my eye. "I have wondered if our evangelical fervor to change the world is not driven in some part by the inability to change ourselves."
This thought was quickly connected in my mind to all of the enthusiasm I've witnessed over the years to change this law or that, to elect this or that candidate, in the hopes that such a political victory will allow us to change the culture from the top-down. If we cannot change our neighborhoods, let us change the law and get the government to do the job for us.
An example of this attitude is the abortion issue. I believe that abortion is a moral evil that should not be legal in any society. Life, given as a gift from God, is far too precious to squander, from beginning to end. {this same principle affect my views on using drugs, education, poverty aid, euthanasia, and more} For nearly half a century abortion has been legal in America. Over 30 million abortions have occurred in that time frame, not because it is legal, but because millions of our fellow Americans have decided that it is easier to rid themselves of an inconvenient child than it is to take responsibility for him/her. Included in this number, are millions of church attenders and millions of teens whose parents are/were Christians. This is not a problem for "them" that those of us within the Church have no responsibility for. We already know that divorce rates and non-marital sex rates are far too similar for self-professing Christians as they are for those who do not claim Christ as Lord.
Where does this leave us. When we realize that political solutions, while necessary, will never solve the problem, we can begin to focus our efforts upon helping our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ live in ways that more clearly reflect the mercy which God has shown us in Christ. The problem is not out "there" among the Lost; the problem is withing the Church, the problem is our own.
It is far easier to change the political landscape and the laws of this nation than it is to reform our churches from within. It is far easier, but far less effective. The revival of the Church in America begins in the pew I sit in on Sunday; it begins with us.
This thought was quickly connected in my mind to all of the enthusiasm I've witnessed over the years to change this law or that, to elect this or that candidate, in the hopes that such a political victory will allow us to change the culture from the top-down. If we cannot change our neighborhoods, let us change the law and get the government to do the job for us.
An example of this attitude is the abortion issue. I believe that abortion is a moral evil that should not be legal in any society. Life, given as a gift from God, is far too precious to squander, from beginning to end. {this same principle affect my views on using drugs, education, poverty aid, euthanasia, and more} For nearly half a century abortion has been legal in America. Over 30 million abortions have occurred in that time frame, not because it is legal, but because millions of our fellow Americans have decided that it is easier to rid themselves of an inconvenient child than it is to take responsibility for him/her. Included in this number, are millions of church attenders and millions of teens whose parents are/were Christians. This is not a problem for "them" that those of us within the Church have no responsibility for. We already know that divorce rates and non-marital sex rates are far too similar for self-professing Christians as they are for those who do not claim Christ as Lord.
Where does this leave us. When we realize that political solutions, while necessary, will never solve the problem, we can begin to focus our efforts upon helping our fellow brothers and sisters in Christ live in ways that more clearly reflect the mercy which God has shown us in Christ. The problem is not out "there" among the Lost; the problem is withing the Church, the problem is our own.
It is far easier to change the political landscape and the laws of this nation than it is to reform our churches from within. It is far easier, but far less effective. The revival of the Church in America begins in the pew I sit in on Sunday; it begins with us.
Sunday, July 22, 2012
Sermon Video: "Nothing new under the sun" - Ecclesiastes 1:4-11
We live in a world of fast paced change. It seems that something new appears almost every day. Yet is any of it really new? Solomon realized 3,000 years ago that human existence was simply repetition of the ideas and efforts of previous generations. The earth remains, we are here for but a moment. How can we find purpose and meaning if human existence never really improves? It is only through God's effort that we are able to accept the sacrifice of Jesus which will begin the process of transforming our human nature and removing the sin which dooms human attempts at self improvement. In the end, without God's help, there will be nothing new under the sun.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Thursday, July 19, 2012
"there is nothing new under the sun" - Ecclesiastes 1:9b
It wouldn't help sell newspapers or magazines, nor would it help TV news ratings if those producing the news admitted that there isn't anything new to report today. About 3,000 years ago Solomon realized that whatever news a person might hear that it wasn't really new, "What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again" (Ecc 1:9a). The reason why there never is really any "new" news is because human nature doesn't change. We may consider ourselves to be enlightened modern human beings who are far superior to our ancient ancestors, but that's just our hubris talking. In reality, we're not any better than they are, nor are we any worse. Man is incapable of changing his state. Education won't do it, training won't do it, nor can a benevolent government either laize-faire or nanny-state change us.
The only thing that can, and will, bring about real change in individuals, communities, and nations, is a relationship with God through the saving power of the sacrifice of Jesus. Why is this? Because God has undertaken to transform us; we couldn't do it ourselves, but he can. This is where faith begins, the realization that nothing will ever be new under the sun until we let God make it happen.
The only thing that can, and will, bring about real change in individuals, communities, and nations, is a relationship with God through the saving power of the sacrifice of Jesus. Why is this? Because God has undertaken to transform us; we couldn't do it ourselves, but he can. This is where faith begins, the realization that nothing will ever be new under the sun until we let God make it happen.
Monday, July 16, 2012
Sermon Video: Is it right in God's sight? - Acts 4:13-22
After having been detained by the Sanhedrin following the healing of a man born lame, Peter and John as told that they may no longer preach anything about Jesus. This decision is reached by those in authority despite the obvious miracle of the man standing before them. In response, Peter asks if it is right to obey men or God. The disciples cannot stop preach the Gospel, nor will they. At this point the religious leadership lets them go despite their desire to further punish Peter and John because of the fear they have of the people (who are amazed at the miracle). How do we know if we should disobey an unjust law or corrupt regime? In the end, Jesus is our example, in this as in all else.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Thursday, July 12, 2012
The Shame of Joe Paterno
There is no excuse. That the family is trying to spin the Freeh report to protect his "legacy" is only adding to the shame he deserves. Joe Paterno may have served his fellow man for decades, and he did, but what will he be remembered for? Looking the other way to protect his buddy and his football program as children were raped by the man whose office was next door. The legal ramifications for Penn State will be huge, and they should be, but the moral ramifications are beyond the pale. Each of those students who gathered to protest the firing of Joe must now look themselves in the mirror and realize that they were helping to protect a man who made an inexcusable evil choice.
Those of us who serve the public as our life's calling know that everything we have worked for could be ruined by a false accusation. It makes us tentative, causes us to have rules about ministering alone with anyone, and plays to our fears. It cannot be helped. The innocent deserve our discomfort.
If any of these 4 leaders at Penn State (plus who knows how many more further down the ladder) had any sense of courage or honor, they would have gone to the police regardless of the consequences. It is not a choice, it is an obligation. Everything else that may be offered in their defense is meaningless. They knew enough, they knew children were at risk, and they walked away. Only one person needed to do the right thing to put a stop to Sandusky's predatory rapes of children; at Penn State, to their shame, there was none.
There is no excuse, only shame.
Those of us who serve the public as our life's calling know that everything we have worked for could be ruined by a false accusation. It makes us tentative, causes us to have rules about ministering alone with anyone, and plays to our fears. It cannot be helped. The innocent deserve our discomfort.
If any of these 4 leaders at Penn State (plus who knows how many more further down the ladder) had any sense of courage or honor, they would have gone to the police regardless of the consequences. It is not a choice, it is an obligation. Everything else that may be offered in their defense is meaningless. They knew enough, they knew children were at risk, and they walked away. Only one person needed to do the right thing to put a stop to Sandusky's predatory rapes of children; at Penn State, to their shame, there was none.
There is no excuse, only shame.
Jesus Christ is the same - Hebrews 13:8
"Jesus Christ is the same yesterday today and forever." A simple enough statement on the face of it, although I feel the need to insert a couple of commas. What's so odd about something staying the same? In reality, it is remarkable for anything to remain the same. When we look at the physical world around us the one constant we see is change. Nothing stays the say, everything is in a state of flux. Our own lives are no different. None of us are the same as we were ten years ago; not only have our bodies aged and changed (usually for the worse), but our relationships and our thinking as well. Change is inevitable.
And yet, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Isn't that what Solomon meant when he wrote, "there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything of which one can say, 'Look! This is something new'? It was here already, long ago; it was here before our time." (Ecclesiastes 1:9b-10) Things such as death, taxes, man's inhumanity to man, natural disasters, pestilence, disease, and war are certainly not new. The 24 hour news channels may report them as if they were a brand new thing, but we know we've seen them all before.
So what makes Jesus different? The last word of the verse is "forever". Everything I listed that we want go end, such as death, will one day be destroyed by the victory that Jesus accomplished with the Cross and the Empty Tomb. One day, death will be no more, a new earth will be free of defect, and those who inhabit it will be free of sin. Solomon knew that those things had all been around, and could see no way in which the evil in our world could be destroyed. In God's wisdom, he sent his Son to our world to solve the dilemma that lead to Solomon's melancholy.
After God's final judgment of his creation, it will be God that remained the same throughout, from beginning to end, and his creation that (thankfully) returned to what it once was. We will change, Jesus Christ has no need to; he will remain the same yesterday, today, and forever.
And yet, the more things change, the more they stay the same. Isn't that what Solomon meant when he wrote, "there is nothing new under the sun. Is there anything of which one can say, 'Look! This is something new'? It was here already, long ago; it was here before our time." (Ecclesiastes 1:9b-10) Things such as death, taxes, man's inhumanity to man, natural disasters, pestilence, disease, and war are certainly not new. The 24 hour news channels may report them as if they were a brand new thing, but we know we've seen them all before.
So what makes Jesus different? The last word of the verse is "forever". Everything I listed that we want go end, such as death, will one day be destroyed by the victory that Jesus accomplished with the Cross and the Empty Tomb. One day, death will be no more, a new earth will be free of defect, and those who inhabit it will be free of sin. Solomon knew that those things had all been around, and could see no way in which the evil in our world could be destroyed. In God's wisdom, he sent his Son to our world to solve the dilemma that lead to Solomon's melancholy.
After God's final judgment of his creation, it will be God that remained the same throughout, from beginning to end, and his creation that (thankfully) returned to what it once was. We will change, Jesus Christ has no need to; he will remain the same yesterday, today, and forever.
Monday, July 9, 2012
Ancient Words Ever True...
I was listening to the song Ancient Words in the office today, considering the words of Peter in Acts 4, and pondering the book, The Reformation by Diarmaid MacCulloch. Where did all of that lead me? The Reformation (in conjunction with the Renaissance) was a difficult time for those who wished to respect ancient traditions. If you wanted to revere all the wisdom of the ancients, you had to deny the observations of men like Copernicus and Galileo in favor of men dead for two thousand years like Aristotle and Ptolemy.
If instead, you opened up the wisdom of the ancients to doubt, even ridicule, how could you hold the line and protect the Orthodox faith from those who would deny the Trinity (for example)?
For us, the answers seem easy: Copernicus was right and that doesn't say anything about Biblical interpretation, it's just an observation from the natural world. It wasn't so simple at the time. We, as supposedly enlightened modern thinkers, may scoff at the foolishness of our forefathers, and shake our heads that they ever burned "witches" at the stake; but the question should be, "Are we any better?"
Take a look around the world we live in. It has become the accepted belief in the Modern West that a human embryo can be disposed of with not a bit of care, and even an ironic moral outrage at those who would seek to "force" a young girl to give birth to the child growing inside of her. It has also become the accepted belief in much of the Modern West that any and all variations of sexuality, co-habitation, and separation are equally valid. That nobody has the right to tell anyone else that their choices are wrong.
Does it really seem so funny that men in the 16th Century were troubled that Copernicus was claiming the earth revolved around the sun? In reality, humanity hasn't "advanced" much at all over the last five centuries. We may know more stuff, and have a lot more widgets and gizmoes to entertain ourselves, but our moral state is just as deprived as the day Luther became troubled with Paul's insistence on fallen humanity in his letter to the Romans.
If instead, you opened up the wisdom of the ancients to doubt, even ridicule, how could you hold the line and protect the Orthodox faith from those who would deny the Trinity (for example)?
For us, the answers seem easy: Copernicus was right and that doesn't say anything about Biblical interpretation, it's just an observation from the natural world. It wasn't so simple at the time. We, as supposedly enlightened modern thinkers, may scoff at the foolishness of our forefathers, and shake our heads that they ever burned "witches" at the stake; but the question should be, "Are we any better?"
Take a look around the world we live in. It has become the accepted belief in the Modern West that a human embryo can be disposed of with not a bit of care, and even an ironic moral outrage at those who would seek to "force" a young girl to give birth to the child growing inside of her. It has also become the accepted belief in much of the Modern West that any and all variations of sexuality, co-habitation, and separation are equally valid. That nobody has the right to tell anyone else that their choices are wrong.
Does it really seem so funny that men in the 16th Century were troubled that Copernicus was claiming the earth revolved around the sun? In reality, humanity hasn't "advanced" much at all over the last five centuries. We may know more stuff, and have a lot more widgets and gizmoes to entertain ourselves, but our moral state is just as deprived as the day Luther became troubled with Paul's insistence on fallen humanity in his letter to the Romans.
Sermon Video - "No other name", Acts 4:1-12
In response to Peter's healing of a crippled man and his preaching to the people in the name of Jesus, the religious leaders demand to know by whose authority Peter has acted. In his defense, Peter boldly claims that the sole source of his healing power is the resurrected Jesus Christ. His conclusion is Christianity's exclusive claim; that there is no other name that we have been given that can save us.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Sunday, July 1, 2012
Sermon Video: "the name of Jesus" - Acts 3:11-16
Following the miraculous healing of a man born crippled, Peter explains to the gathering crowd that it was not the power responsible did not belong to him. The miracle was through and in the name of Jesus of Nazareth, the same Jesus who the people of Jerusalem put to death. By insisting that the name of Jesus, and the faith that comes through him, was the basis for the healing, Peter is declaring Jesus to be God himself. Only God has the power to perform miracles because there is only one God. In the end, it is faith in Jesus Christ that can heal, both body and spirit, and nothing else.
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
To watch the video, click on the link below:
Sermon Video
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)